mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007391.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "1",
    "document_number": "486",
    "date": "11/22/21",
    "document_type": "Letter",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 486 Filed 11/22/21 Page 1 of 2\nU.S Department of Justice\nUnited States Attorney\nSouthern District of New York\nThe Silvio J. Mollo Building\nOne Saint Andrew's Plaza\nNew York, New York 10007\nNovember 22, 2021\nBY ECF\nThe Honorable Alison J. Nathan\nUnited States District Court\nSouthern District of New York\nUnited States Courthouse\n40 Foley Square\nNew York, New York 10007\nRe: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)\nDear Judge Nathan:\nPursuant to the Court's Orders at Dkt. Nos. 473, 474, and 476, the parties are docketing today the Government's motion to quash the defendant's Rule 17(c) subpoena, proposed redacted versions of the Government's letter motion of November 18, 2021 and the defendant's response, and proposed redacted versions of the defendant's response relating to Government Exhibit 52 and the Government's reply.\nThe defense has informed the Government that they are not seeking redactions to these filings.\nThe Government's proposed redactions are consistent with the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006).\nAlthough the parties' supplemental briefing and the Court's Opinion & Order are judicial documents subject to the common law presumption of access, the limited proposed redactions are narrowly tailored to protect the privacy interests of the Minor Victims and witnesses, including individuals who have not identified themselves on the record in this case, and who are subjects of the Court's pseudonym order.\nDOJ-OGR-00007391",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 486 Filed 11/22/21 Page 1 of 2",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "U.S Department of Justice\nUnited States Attorney\nSouthern District of New York\nThe Silvio J. Mollo Building\nOne Saint Andrew's Plaza\nNew York, New York 10007",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "November 22, 2021",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "BY ECF\nThe Honorable Alison J. Nathan\nUnited States District Court\nSouthern District of New York\nUnited States Courthouse\n40 Foley Square\nNew York, New York 10007",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Dear Judge Nathan:\nPursuant to the Court's Orders at Dkt. Nos. 473, 474, and 476, the parties are docketing today the Government's motion to quash the defendant's Rule 17(c) subpoena, proposed redacted versions of the Government's letter motion of November 18, 2021 and the defendant's response, and proposed redacted versions of the defendant's response relating to Government Exhibit 52 and the Government's reply.\nThe defense has informed the Government that they are not seeking redactions to these filings.\nThe Government's proposed redactions are consistent with the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006).\nAlthough the parties' supplemental briefing and the Court's Opinion & Order are judicial documents subject to the common law presumption of access, the limited proposed redactions are narrowly tailored to protect the privacy interests of the Minor Victims and witnesses, including individuals who have not identified themselves on the record in this case, and who are subjects of the Court's pseudonym order.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00007391",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Alison J. Nathan",
      "Ghislaine Maxwell"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "U.S Department of Justice",
      "United States Attorney",
      "United States District Court",
      "Second Circuit"
    ],
    "locations": [
      "New York",
      "Southern District of New York",
      "Onondaga"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "November 22, 2021",
      "November 18, 2021",
      "2006"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "20 Cr. 330 (AJN)",
      "Dkt. Nos. 473, 474, and 476",
      "435 F.3d 110",
      "DOJ-OGR-00007391"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a formal letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to the Honorable Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The document is well-formatted and free of significant damage or redactions."
}