DOJ-OGR-00000389.json 4.0 KB

12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "3",
  4. "document_number": "18",
  5. "date": "07/16/19",
  6. "document_type": "Court Transcript",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case#19-cr-00490-RMB Document 18 Filed 07/16/19 Page 3 of 18 3\nthat there is a guilty determination by a jury or by the Court,\nthat he is presumed to be innocent.\nI did have these questions. One has to do with persons who are categorized as victims. I want to get some\nassurance from the U.S. Attorney's office that they have been\nnotified about this case and that you will keep them abreast of\ndevelopments in this case.\nMR. ROSSMILLER: Yes, your Honor, we are acutely aware\nof our obligations to the victims in this case. We have\nnotified them and we expect to continue to do so as the case\nmoves forward.\nTHE COURT: Second, for my background, I am aware that\nthere are certain conditions that attach to Mr. Epstein's sex\noffender status resulting from his Florida state prosecution in\nor about 2008. One result is that under New York law --\ncorrect me if I'm wrong about any of this -- he is considered\nto be at high risk of committing another sex crime with minors.\nIs that a fair characterization of his sex offender status?\nMR. ROSSMILLER: Your Honor, as the government set\nforth in its submission to Judge Pitman, and we copied this\nCourt, it is our understanding that the defendant is a tier 3\nsex offender in New York and that that is characterized as\nhigh-risk individual.\nTHE COURT: The question that I have is what are the\nimplications, if any, of the search conducted by the U.S.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00000389",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case#19-cr-00490-RMB Document 18 Filed 07/16/19 Page 3 of 18 3",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "that there is a guilty determination by a jury or by the Court,\nthat he is presumed to be innocent.\nI did have these questions. One has to do with persons who are categorized as victims. I want to get some\nassurance from the U.S. Attorney's office that they have been\nnotified about this case and that you will keep them abreast of\ndevelopments in this case.\nMR. ROSSMILLER: Yes, your Honor, we are acutely aware\nof our obligations to the victims in this case. We have\nnotified them and we expect to continue to do so as the case\nmoves forward.\nTHE COURT: Second, for my background, I am aware that\nthere are certain conditions that attach to Mr. Epstein's sex\noffender status resulting from his Florida state prosecution in\nor about 2008. One result is that under New York law --\ncorrect me if I'm wrong about any of this -- he is considered\nto be at high risk of committing another sex crime with minors.\nIs that a fair characterization of his sex offender status?\nMR. ROSSMILLER: Your Honor, as the government set\nforth in its submission to Judge Pitman, and we copied this\nCourt, it is our understanding that the defendant is a tier 3\nsex offender in New York and that that is characterized as\nhigh-risk individual.\nTHE COURT: The question that I have is what are the\nimplications, if any, of the search conducted by the U.S.",
  20. "position": "main"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
  25. "position": "footer"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00000389",
  30. "position": "footer"
  31. }
  32. ],
  33. "entities": {
  34. "people": [
  35. "MR. ROSSMILLER",
  36. "Mr. Epstein",
  37. "Judge Pitman"
  38. ],
  39. "organizations": [
  40. "U.S. Attorney's office",
  41. "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
  42. ],
  43. "locations": [
  44. "New York",
  45. "Florida"
  46. ],
  47. "dates": [
  48. "07/16/19",
  49. "2008"
  50. ],
  51. "reference_numbers": [
  52. "19-cr-00490-RMB",
  53. "Document 18",
  54. "DOJ-OGR-00000389"
  55. ]
  56. },
  57. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
  58. }