DOJ-OGR-00000653.json 4.0 KB

1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253545556575859
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "15",
  4. "document_number": "53",
  5. "date": "09/03/19",
  6. "document_type": "court transcript",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 53 Filed 09/03/19 Page 15 of 86\nJ8RsEPS1\n\n1 understands, the NPA and the role of the NPA was going to be critically important. And I would simply like to report that we went pretty far along.\n\nWe interviewed all of the relevant lawyers on the defense side who participated in the NPA, and we were satisfied that we had a very strong argument that every one of those lawyers believed with an objective basis that the deal was global. That is, at the time --\n\nTHE COURT: I'm sorry, that?\n\nMR. WEINGARTEN: The deal of the NPA was global. That is, more specifically, at the time, the Florida prosecutors and agents knew of conduct in New York, and that no competent defense counsel negotiating in good faith with the prosecutors would have ever agreed to a deal back then that allowed New York prosecutors to indict for precisely the same conduct in the future, which, of course, is what happened.\n\nIn addition, we have come up with very powerful evidence, we believe, that Florida prosecutors, who participated in the deal, steered the victims and the alleged victims to New York on more than one occasion because they did not want to suffer the sleights of attacks against them. So we have advanced the ball on this very subject and we are prepared to completely report to the court as to where we are and what we've done.\n\nAnother point. We obviously had contact with our\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nDOJ-OGR-00000653",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 53 Filed 09/03/19 Page 15 of 86",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "J8RsEPS1",
  20. "position": "header"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "1 understands, the NPA and the role of the NPA was going to be critically important. And I would simply like to report that we went pretty far along.\n\nWe interviewed all of the relevant lawyers on the defense side who participated in the NPA, and we were satisfied that we had a very strong argument that every one of those lawyers believed with an objective basis that the deal was global. That is, at the time --\n\nTHE COURT: I'm sorry, that?\n\nMR. WEINGARTEN: The deal of the NPA was global. That is, more specifically, at the time, the Florida prosecutors and agents knew of conduct in New York, and that no competent defense counsel negotiating in good faith with the prosecutors would have ever agreed to a deal back then that allowed New York prosecutors to indict for precisely the same conduct in the future, which, of course, is what happened.\n\nIn addition, we have come up with very powerful evidence, we believe, that Florida prosecutors, who participated in the deal, steered the victims and the alleged victims to New York on more than one occasion because they did not want to suffer the sleights of attacks against them. So we have advanced the ball on this very subject and we are prepared to completely report to the court as to where we are and what we've done.\n\nAnother point. We obviously had contact with our",
  25. "position": "main"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
  30. "position": "footer"
  31. },
  32. {
  33. "type": "printed",
  34. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00000653",
  35. "position": "footer"
  36. }
  37. ],
  38. "entities": {
  39. "people": [
  40. "MR. WEINGARTEN"
  41. ],
  42. "organizations": [
  43. "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
  44. ],
  45. "locations": [
  46. "New York",
  47. "Florida"
  48. ],
  49. "dates": [
  50. "09/03/19"
  51. ],
  52. "reference_numbers": [
  53. "1:19-cr-00490-RMB",
  54. "53",
  55. "DOJ-OGR-00000653"
  56. ]
  57. },
  58. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
  59. }