mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00001032.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "91",
    "document_number": "20-2",
    "date": "04/01/2021",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 21-770, Document 20-2, 04/01/2021, 3068530, Page91 of 200\n28\n1    In addition to the financial information described in\n2    the government's memoranda, we note, your Honor, that in the\n3    Pretrial Services report it appears that the defendant tried\n4    initially to brush off the subject of her finances when the\n5    Pretrial Services officer asked her, noting that she didn't\n6    have those details. The defendant ultimately provided limited,\n7    unverified, and questionable information that now appears in\n8    the Pretrial Services report. She listed bank accounts\n9    totaling less than a million dollars and a monthly income of\n10   nothing. Zero dollars per month of income.\n11   In addition to the matter of her finances, the report\n12   raises other concerns about whether the defendant has been\n13   fully transparent with the court or whether she is being\n14   evasive.\n15   THE COURT: Ms. Moe, you have emphasized the\n16   indication on the financial report of zero dollars of the\n17   income. Does the government think that there is income? Is\n18   there some uncertainty as to whether that is investment income\n19   as opposed to employment income or the like? What is the\n20   reason for the emphasis on that or to the extent it is an\n21   indication that the government finds that implausible?\n22   MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor.\n23   Separate from the matter of employment, it is very\n24   unclear whether the defendant is receiving proceeds from trust\n25   accounts or an inheritance or means of other kinds. It is\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00001032",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 21-770, Document 20-2, 04/01/2021, 3068530, Page91 of 200",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1    In addition to the financial information described in\n2    the government's memoranda, we note, your Honor, that in the\n3    Pretrial Services report it appears that the defendant tried\n4    initially to brush off the subject of her finances when the\n5    Pretrial Services officer asked her, noting that she didn't\n6    have those details. The defendant ultimately provided limited,\n7    unverified, and questionable information that now appears in\n8    the Pretrial Services report. She listed bank accounts\n9    totaling less than a million dollars and a monthly income of\n10   nothing. Zero dollars per month of income.\n11   In addition to the matter of her finances, the report\n12   raises other concerns about whether the defendant has been\n13   fully transparent with the court or whether she is being\n14   evasive.\n15   THE COURT: Ms. Moe, you have emphasized the\n16   indication on the financial report of zero dollars of the\n17   income. Does the government think that there is income? Is\n18   there some uncertainty as to whether that is investment income\n19   as opposed to employment income or the like? What is the\n20   reason for the emphasis on that or to the extent it is an\n21   indication that the government finds that implausible?\n22   MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor.\n23   Separate from the matter of employment, it is very\n24   unclear whether the defendant is receiving proceeds from trust\n25   accounts or an inheritance or means of other kinds. It is",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00001032",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ms. Moe"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "Pretrial Services",
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.",
      "DOJ"
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "04/01/2021"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "Case 21-770",
      "Document 20-2",
      "3068530",
      "DOJ-OGR-00001032"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and readable format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}