DOJ-OGR-00001077.json 4.0 KB

1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "136",
  4. "document_number": "20-2",
  5. "date": "04/01/2021",
  6. "document_type": "court transcript",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 21-770, Document 20-2, 04/01/2021, 3068530, Page136 of 200\n73\n1 the court, significantly.\n2 And while we recognize that it appears that the defendant's extensive resources may be in complicated banking\n3 records, at a basic level, the defense argument is that she cannot remember off the top of her head just how many millions\n4 of dollars she has. That should cause the court serious concern.\n5 A bail hearing, your Honor, is not an opportunity for the defendant to slowly reveal information until the court\n6 deems it sufficient. That is not sufficient process here. That is not appropriate. This information is coming out in\n7 dribs and drabs, and defendant should not be in a position to slowly but surely concede, as the government reveals, that she\n8 has been less than candid with the court about her finances.\n9 There are serious concerns here.\n10 With respect to the notion that the defendant could just surrender her passports, there are of course no limitations this court could set on a foreign government\n11 issuing travel documents to defendant or accepting her if she were to enter into that country.\n12 And finally, your Honor, with respect to the case law that defense has cited, they ignore the obvious comparator\n13 case, which is Judge Berman's decision regarding Jeffrey Epstein, who was arrested both on risk of flight grounds and on\n14 dangerousness grounds. And as Judge Berman detailed, the\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00001077",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 21-770, Document 20-2, 04/01/2021, 3068530, Page136 of 200",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "the court, significantly. And while we recognize that it appears that the defendant's extensive resources may be in complicated banking records, at a basic level, the defense argument is that she cannot remember off the top of her head just how many millions of dollars she has. That should cause the court serious concern. A bail hearing, your Honor, is not an opportunity for the defendant to slowly reveal information until the court deems it sufficient. That is not sufficient process here. That is not appropriate. This information is coming out in dribs and drabs, and defendant should not be in a position to slowly but surely concede, as the government reveals, that she has been less than candid with the court about her finances. There are serious concerns here. With respect to the notion that the defendant could just surrender her passports, there are of course no limitations this court could set on a foreign government issuing travel documents to defendant or accepting her if she were to enter into that country. And finally, your Honor, with respect to the case law that defense has cited, they ignore the obvious comparator case, which is Judge Berman's decision regarding Jeffrey Epstein, who was arrested both on risk of flight grounds and on dangerousness grounds. And as Judge Berman detailed, the",
  20. "position": "main content"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
  25. "position": "footer"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00001077",
  30. "position": "footer"
  31. }
  32. ],
  33. "entities": {
  34. "people": [
  35. "Jeffrey Epstein",
  36. "Judge Berman"
  37. ],
  38. "organizations": [
  39. "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
  40. ],
  41. "locations": [],
  42. "dates": [
  43. "04/01/2021"
  44. ],
  45. "reference_numbers": [
  46. "Case 21-770",
  47. "Document 20-2",
  48. "3068530",
  49. "DOJ-OGR-00001077"
  50. ]
  51. },
  52. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
  53. }