mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00001239.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "7",
    "document_number": "20-cr-0330",
    "date": null,
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case1:20-cr-0330-AJN Document 211-1 Filed 08/20/21 Page 7 of 9 accounts and will be entrusted with the authority to oversee the assets of Ms. Maxwell and her spouse, as described above. Restraining Ms. Maxwell's assets that are not used to secure the bond and placing them under the supervision of a former federal District Court judge eliminates any concern that such funds could be used to violate the terms of release. II. Ms. Maxwell's Pretrial Motions Raise Substantial Legal and Factual Issues That Could Result in Dismissal of Some or All of the Charges Against Her In addition to the new conditions proposed above, the numerous substantive pretrial motions now before the Court amply challenge the purported strength of the government's case. Ms. Maxwell's pretrial motions raise serious legal issues that could result in dismissal of charges, if not the entire indictment. Among the dozen submissions are motions to dismiss the superseding indictment for breach of the non-prosecution agreement, for pre-indictment delay, and for being based on improperly obtained evidence in violation of Ms. Maxwell's constitutional rights under the Fifth and Sixth the Amendments. Other motions seek dismissal of the Mann Act charges as being time-barred and the perjury charges as based on non-perjurious statements. These motions are substantial with a likelihood of success on the merits. These motions cast substantial doubt on the alleged strength of the government's case and warrant granting bail on the conditions proposed. III. The Court Should Grant Bail Under the Bail Reform Act of 1984, a defendant must be released on personal recognizance or unsecured personal bond unless the judicial officer determines \"that such release will not reasonably assure the appearance of the person as required or will endanger the safety of any other person or the community.\" 18 U.S.C. § 3142(b). The enhanced bail package proposed by Ms. Maxwell contains financial burdens and a combination of restrictions that reasonably 7 DOJ-OGR-00001239",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case1:20-cr-0330-AJN Document 211-1 Filed 08/20/21 Page 7 of 9",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "accounts and will be entrusted with the authority to oversee the assets of Ms. Maxwell and her spouse, as described above. Restraining Ms. Maxwell's assets that are not used to secure the bond and placing them under the supervision of a former federal District Court judge eliminates any concern that such funds could be used to violate the terms of release.",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "II. Ms. Maxwell's Pretrial Motions Raise Substantial Legal and Factual Issues That Could Result in Dismissal of Some or All of the Charges Against Her",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "In addition to the new conditions proposed above, the numerous substantive pretrial motions now before the Court amply challenge the purported strength of the government's case. Ms. Maxwell's pretrial motions raise serious legal issues that could result in dismissal of charges, if not the entire indictment. Among the dozen submissions are motions to dismiss the superseding indictment for breach of the non-prosecution agreement, for pre-indictment delay, and for being based on improperly obtained evidence in violation of Ms. Maxwell's constitutional rights under the Fifth and Sixth the Amendments. Other motions seek dismissal of the Mann Act charges as being time-barred and the perjury charges as based on non-perjurious statements. These motions are substantial with a likelihood of success on the merits. These motions cast substantial doubt on the alleged strength of the government's case and warrant granting bail on the conditions proposed.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "III. The Court Should Grant Bail",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Under the Bail Reform Act of 1984, a defendant must be released on personal recognizance or unsecured personal bond unless the judicial officer determines \"that such release will not reasonably assure the appearance of the person as required or will endanger the safety of any other person or the community.\" 18 U.S.C. § 3142(b). The enhanced bail package proposed by Ms. Maxwell contains financial burdens and a combination of restrictions that reasonably",
      "position": "bottom"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "7",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00001239",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ms. Maxwell"
    ],
    "organizations": [],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/20/21",
      "1984"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "20-cr-0330",
      "18 U.S.C. § 3142(b)",
      "DOJ-OGR-00001239"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to the case of Ms. Maxwell, discussing pretrial motions and bail conditions. The text is well-formatted and printed, with no visible handwriting or stamps."
}