mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00001618.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "8",
    "document_number": "22",
    "date": "07/13/20",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-000330-AJN Document 22 Filed 07/13/20 Page 8 of 19\nappear to depend on any job - or to have depended on any employment in the past 30 years - for\nthe privileged lifestyle she has maintained for the entirety of that period. The defendant clearly\nhas the means to flee.\nMore troubling still, the defendant's conduct at the time of her arrest further underscores\nthe risk of flight she poses. When FBI agents arrived at the defendant's remote property in New\nHampshire on the morning of July 2, 2020, they discovered the property was barred by a locked\ngate. After breaching the gate, the agents observed an individual who was later determined to be\na private security guard. As the agents approached the front door to the main house, they\nannounced themselves as FBI agents and directed the defendant to open the door. Through a\nwindow, the agents saw the defendant ignore the direction to open the door and, instead, try to flee\nto another room in the house, quickly shutting a door behind her. Agents were ultimately forced\nto breach the door in order to enter the house to arrest the defendant, who was found in an interior\nroom in the house. Moreover, as the agents conducted a security sweep of the house, they also\nnoticed a cell phone wrapped in tin foil on top of a desk, a seemingly misguided effort to evade\ndetection, not by the press or public, which of course would have no ability to trace her phone or\nintercept her communications, but by law enforcement.\nFollowing the defendant's arrest, the FBI spoke with the security guard, who informed the\nagents that the defendant's brother had hired a security company staffed with former members of\nthe British military to guard the defendant at the New Hampshire property, in rotations. The\ndefendant provided one of the guards with a credit card in the same name as the LLC that had\npurchased the New Hampshire property in cash. The guard informed the FBI that the defendant\nhad not left the property during his time working there, and that instead, the guard was sent to\n7\nDOJ-OGR-00001618",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-000330-AJN Document 22 Filed 07/13/20 Page 8 of 19",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "appear to depend on any job - or to have depended on any employment in the past 30 years - for\nthe privileged lifestyle she has maintained for the entirety of that period. The defendant clearly\nhas the means to flee.",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "More troubling still, the defendant's conduct at the time of her arrest further underscores\nthe risk of flight she poses. When FBI agents arrived at the defendant's remote property in New\nHampshire on the morning of July 2, 2020, they discovered the property was barred by a locked\ngate. After breaching the gate, the agents observed an individual who was later determined to be\na private security guard. As the agents approached the front door to the main house, they\nannounced themselves as FBI agents and directed the defendant to open the door. Through a\nwindow, the agents saw the defendant ignore the direction to open the door and, instead, try to flee\nto another room in the house, quickly shutting a door behind her. Agents were ultimately forced\nto breach the door in order to enter the house to arrest the defendant, who was found in an interior\nroom in the house. Moreover, as the agents conducted a security sweep of the house, they also\nnoticed a cell phone wrapped in tin foil on top of a desk, a seemingly misguided effort to evade\ndetection, not by the press or public, which of course would have no ability to trace her phone or\nintercept her communications, but by law enforcement.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Following the defendant's arrest, the FBI spoke with the security guard, who informed the\nagents that the defendant's brother had hired a security company staffed with former members of\nthe British military to guard the defendant at the New Hampshire property, in rotations. The\ndefendant provided one of the guards with a credit card in the same name as the LLC that had\npurchased the New Hampshire property in cash. The guard informed the FBI that the defendant\nhad not left the property during his time working there, and that instead, the guard was sent to",
      "position": "bottom"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "7",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00001618",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "defendant",
      "defendant's brother"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "FBI",
      "British military",
      "LLC"
    ],
    "locations": [
      "New Hampshire"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "July 2, 2020",
      "07/13/20"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-000330-AJN",
      "Document 22",
      "DOJ-OGR-00001618"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to a criminal case. The text is printed and there are no visible stamps or handwritten notes. The document is page 8 of 19."
}