mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00001894.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "17",
    "document_number": "93",
    "date": "12/10/20",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 93 Filed 12/10/20 Page 17 of 91\n17\n1    the court's approval, assumes there will be no substantive\n2    superseding indictment. If there is one, which the government\n3    has advised us they don't believe is imminent or I assume not\n4    at all, we might have to come back to the court to address not\n5    just trial schedule but other schedule as well.\n6        And I am assuming -- we take your Honor's points about\n7    the issues on discovery, and we agree with them, particularly\n8    as to electronic discovery; and I am assuming that, as this\n9    unfolds, if we spot an issue we think needs further attention,\n10   we will be able to bring it to the court's attention.\n11       Those are my points.\n12   THE COURT: Thank you, Mr. Cohen.\n13       Let me go ahead and ask, Ms. Moe, Mr. Cohen has made a\n14   representation but I will ask if you do anticipate at this time\n15   filing any further superseding indictments adding either\n16   defendants or additional charges?\n17       MS. MOE: Your Honor, our investigation remains\n18   ongoing, but at this point we do not currently anticipate\n19   seeking a superseding indictment.\n20       THE COURT: All right. So with that -- and also let\n21   me ask, Ms. Moe, just because it is next on my list, what\n22   processes the government has put in place to notify alleged\n23   victims of events and court dates pursuant to the Crime Victims\n24   Rights Act.\n25       MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor. I am happy to give the\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00001894",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 93 Filed 12/10/20 Page 17 of 91",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "17",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1    the court's approval, assumes there will be no substantive\n2    superseding indictment. If there is one, which the government\n3    has advised us they don't believe is imminent or I assume not\n4    at all, we might have to come back to the court to address not\n5    just trial schedule but other schedule as well.\n6        And I am assuming -- we take your Honor's points about\n7    the issues on discovery, and we agree with them, particularly\n8    as to electronic discovery; and I am assuming that, as this\n9    unfolds, if we spot an issue we think needs further attention,\n10   we will be able to bring it to the court's attention.\n11       Those are my points.\n12   THE COURT: Thank you, Mr. Cohen.\n13       Let me go ahead and ask, Ms. Moe, Mr. Cohen has made a\n14   representation but I will ask if you do anticipate at this time\n15   filing any further superseding indictments adding either\n16   defendants or additional charges?\n17       MS. MOE: Your Honor, our investigation remains\n18   ongoing, but at this point we do not currently anticipate\n19   seeking a superseding indictment.\n20       THE COURT: All right. So with that -- and also let\n21   me ask, Ms. Moe, just because it is next on my list, what\n22   processes the government has put in place to notify alleged\n23   victims of events and court dates pursuant to the Crime Victims\n24   Rights Act.\n25       MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor. I am happy to give the",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00001894",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Mr. Cohen",
      "Ms. Moe"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "12/10/20"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-AJN",
      "93",
      "DOJ-OGR-00001894"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}