mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00002115.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "20",
    "document_number": "97-21",
    "date": "12/14/20",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 97-21 Filed 12/14/20 Page 20 of 29\n\n4. Practical Experience\n\n4.1. Mr Perry has acted for governments and individuals in the most important and high-profile extradition matters, including extradition requests between the United Kingdom and the United States:\n\n- USA v Mackellar: Acted on behalf of the Governor of the Cayman Islands in extradition proceedings brought on behalf of the Government of the United States.\n- USA v Brian Dempsey [2020] EWHC 603 (Admin): Appeared for the Government of the United States in relation to an extradition request for an individual who had travelled to Syria as part of the on-going conflict.\n- Russia v Alexander Zmikhnovskiy Westminster Magistrates Court, 15 April 2019 (unreported): Extradition request of former CEO of Oboronenergosbyt JSC, who was alleged to have been involved in fraud by the Russian Federation, his extradition was refused on several grounds.\n- Russia v Yurov, Westminster Magistrates Court, 28 September 2018 (unreported): Appeared for Ilya Yurov, former Chairman of a large Russian bank and previously accused of fraud, to successfully resist an extradition request from Russia.\n- Russia v A: Instructed to advise A in respect of a prospective extradition request from Russia. The issues in the case relate to prison conditions, health, and fair trial.\n- R (HH) v Westminster Magistrates' Court [2012] UKSC 25; [2012] 3 WLR 90: one of the leading cases on the application of Article 8 ECHR in extradition proceedings\n- Norris v Government of the United States of America [2010] UKSC 9; [2010] 2 AC 487: Represented the Government of the United States in the Supreme Court in the leading case on the application of Articles 3 and 8 of the Convention in extradition proceedings.\n- Norris v Government of the United States of America [2008] UKHL 16, [2008] 1 AC 920: Represented the Government of the United States in the House of Lords in the leading case on cartels and competition law, and the requirement of double criminality in extradition proceedings.\n- R (Bermingham) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office [2006] EWHC 200 (Admin); [2007] QB 727: the extradition of the 'Natwest Three', one of the first cases US cases to proceed under the Extradition Act 2003.\n\nDOJ-OGR-00002115",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 97-21 Filed 12/14/20 Page 20 of 29",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "4. Practical Experience\n\n4.1. Mr Perry has acted for governments and individuals in the most important and high-profile extradition matters, including extradition requests between the United Kingdom and the United States:",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "- USA v Mackellar: Acted on behalf of the Governor of the Cayman Islands in extradition proceedings brought on behalf of the Government of the United States.\n- USA v Brian Dempsey [2020] EWHC 603 (Admin): Appeared for the Government of the United States in relation to an extradition request for an individual who had travelled to Syria as part of the on-going conflict.\n- Russia v Alexander Zmikhnovskiy Westminster Magistrates Court, 15 April 2019 (unreported): Extradition request of former CEO of Oboronenergosbyt JSC, who was alleged to have been involved in fraud by the Russian Federation, his extradition was refused on several grounds.\n- Russia v Yurov, Westminster Magistrates Court, 28 September 2018 (unreported): Appeared for Ilya Yurov, former Chairman of a large Russian bank and previously accused of fraud, to successfully resist an extradition request from Russia.\n- Russia v A: Instructed to advise A in respect of a prospective extradition request from Russia. The issues in the case relate to prison conditions, health, and fair trial.\n- R (HH) v Westminster Magistrates' Court [2012] UKSC 25; [2012] 3 WLR 90: one of the leading cases on the application of Article 8 ECHR in extradition proceedings\n- Norris v Government of the United States of America [2010] UKSC 9; [2010] 2 AC 487: Represented the Government of the United States in the Supreme Court in the leading case on the application of Articles 3 and 8 of the Convention in extradition proceedings.\n- Norris v Government of the United States of America [2008] UKHL 16, [2008] 1 AC 920: Represented the Government of the United States in the House of Lords in the leading case on cartels and competition law, and the requirement of double criminality in extradition proceedings.\n- R (Bermingham) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office [2006] EWHC 200 (Admin); [2007] QB 727: the extradition of the 'Natwest Three', one of the first cases US cases to proceed under the Extradition Act 2003.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00002115",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Mr Perry",
      "Mackellar",
      "Brian Dempsey",
      "Alexander Zmikhnovskiy",
      "Ilya Yurov",
      "HH",
      "Norris",
      "Bermingham"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "Government of the United States",
      "Cayman Islands",
      "Russian Federation",
      "Oboronenergosbyt JSC",
      "Westminster Magistrates Court",
      "Supreme Court",
      "House of Lords",
      "Serious Fraud Office"
    ],
    "locations": [
      "United Kingdom",
      "United States",
      "Cayman Islands",
      "Syria",
      "Russia"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "12/14/20",
      "2020",
      "15 April 2019",
      "28 September 2018",
      "2012",
      "2010",
      "2008",
      "2006",
      "2007"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN",
      "Document 97-21",
      "DOJ-OGR-00002115"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to extradition proceedings. It is a typed document with no handwritten notes or stamps. The text is clear and legible."
}