| 12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455 |
- {
- "document_metadata": {
- "page_number": "20 of 27",
- "document_number": "136",
- "date": "02/04/21",
- "document_type": "court document",
- "has_handwriting": false,
- "has_stamps": false
- },
- "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 136 Filed 02/04/21 Page 20 of 27\n\nMs. Maxwell also was asked if she knew whether Epstein possessed \"sex toys or devices\" used \"in sexual activities.\" Again, the question was objected to because it was compound, vague, contained several undefined terms, and lacked foundation, and was unbounded by time and place. Notably, the questioner did not ask whether Ms. Maxwell saw or heard Epstein use any particular \"device.\"\n\n2. Questions About\n\n15\nDOJ-OGR-00002429",
- "text_blocks": [
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 136 Filed 02/04/21 Page 20 of 27",
- "position": "header"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Ms. Maxwell also was asked if she knew whether Epstein possessed \"sex toys or devices\" used \"in sexual activities.\" Again, the question was objected to because it was compound, vague, contained several undefined terms, and lacked foundation, and was unbounded by time and place. Notably, the questioner did not ask whether Ms. Maxwell saw or heard Epstein use any particular \"device.\"",
- "position": "top"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "2. Questions About",
- "position": "middle"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "15",
- "position": "bottom"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "DOJ-OGR-00002429",
- "position": "footer"
- }
- ],
- "entities": {
- "people": [
- "Ms. Maxwell",
- "Epstein"
- ],
- "organizations": [],
- "locations": [],
- "dates": [
- "02/04/21"
- ],
- "reference_numbers": [
- "1:20-cr-00330-AJN",
- "136",
- "DOJ-OGR-00002429"
- ]
- },
- "additional_notes": "The document contains redactions, likely due to sensitive information."
- }
|
