mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00002496.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "30 of 33",
    "document_number": "136-9",
    "date": "02/04/21",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "through in the order that we have been doing, move on to the next Does, for example. And if a party, like Professor Dershowitz, has made clear that they do not object, then certainly we understand those should be unsealed. But for many of these nonparties we know for a fact that they did not actually receive the notice, despite everyone's best efforts to get them notice.\n\nSo I would say that, unfortunately, we still need to continue to redact them until we take up those particular Does in the future and your Honor has an opportunity to do the particularized review that the protocol promised would happen with respect to nonparties, whether or not they objected.\n\nTHE COURT: Ms. McCawley.\n\nMS. MCCAWLEY: Yes, your Honor. I think it's analogous to this situation where we have got a party who is saying they are not objecting. They have the notice. They received it. They did not object. And the burden on the Court and the parties to go through this process --\n\nTHE COURT: You broke up a little bit. Would you go back. Somebody has another device on.\n\nMs. McCawley, would you go back to the burden on the Court and the parties, please.\n\nMS. MCCAWLEY: Yes, your Honor. The burden on the Court and the parties is extensive with respect to this grouping of individuals who have not objected. So it seems to\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "through in the order that we have been doing, move on to the next Does, for example. And if a party, like Professor Dershowitz, has made clear that they do not object, then certainly we understand those should be unsealed. But for many of these nonparties we know for a fact that they did not actually receive the notice, despite everyone's best efforts to get them notice.",
      "position": "main body"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "So I would say that, unfortunately, we still need to continue to redact them until we take up those particular Does in the future and your Honor has an opportunity to do the particularized review that the protocol promised would happen with respect to nonparties, whether or not they objected.",
      "position": "main body"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "THE COURT: Ms. McCawley.",
      "position": "main body"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "MS. MCCAWLEY: Yes, your Honor. I think it's analogous to this situation where we have got a party who is saying they are not objecting. They have the notice. They received it. They did not object. And the burden on the Court and the parties to go through this process --",
      "position": "main body"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "THE COURT: You broke up a little bit. Would you go back. Somebody has another device on.",
      "position": "main body"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Ms. McCawley, would you go back to the burden on the Court and the parties, please.",
      "position": "main body"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "MS. MCCAWLEY: Yes, your Honor. The burden on the Court and the parties is extensive with respect to this grouping of individuals who have not objected. So it seems to",
      "position": "main body"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Professor Dershowitz",
      "Ms. McCawley"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "02/04/21"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "136-9",
      "DOJ-OGR-00002496"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage to the document."
}