DOJ-OGR-00002688.json 5.5 KB

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "13",
  4. "document_number": "146",
  5. "date": "02/04/21",
  6. "document_type": "court document",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 146 Filed 02/04/21 Page 13 of 16\nor Accuser-2, or that there is any causal relationship between the alleged incidents involving Accuser-3 in England and those involving Accuser-1 and Accuser-2 in the United States.\nTo the extent there is any doubt about the scope of the alleged conspiratorial agreement, or how the allegations relating to Accuser-3 are within the scope of that agreement, the Court can resolve the issue by ordering a bill of particulars on these points, as the court did in Hsia.\nHowever, if the government cannot articulate how alleged sexual conduct with a person who never traveled falls within the scope of a conspiracy to cause another individual to travel, then allegations concerning Accuser-3 should be stricken.\nC. The Allegations Regarding Accuser-3 Are Unduly Prejudicial to Ms. Maxwell.\nThere can be no legitimate dispute that the allegations regarding Accuser-3 are inflammatory and unduly prejudicial to Ms. Maxwell. The indictment alleges that Epstein \"sexually abused\" Accuser-3 and that Ms. Maxwell encouraged Accuser-3 to massage Epstein, \"knowing that Epstein intended to sexually abuse\" Accuser-3. Indictment ¶¶ 7c, 11d, 17d. The phrase \"sexual abuse\" connotes criminal activity, even though the alleged conduct may well have been lawful: Accuser-3 was at or above the legal age of consent in England at all relevant times, and the indictment contains no suggestion that the alleged sexual activity involving Accuser-3 was nonconsensual. Regardless of whether the conduct was lawful or unlawful in England, however, few allegations could be more prejudicial to a defendant than allegations that she participated in the \"sexual abuse\" of a teenager. The allegations as to Accuser-3, though irrelevant to the government's conspiracy counts, thus create precisely the prejudicial appearance the government seeks.\nBecause the allegations as to Accuser-3 are both irrelevant to the charges against Ms. Maxwell and unduly prejudicial, they should be stricken as surplusage.\n9\nDOJ-OGR-00002688",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 146 Filed 02/04/21 Page 13 of 16",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "or Accuser-2, or that there is any causal relationship between the alleged incidents involving Accuser-3 in England and those involving Accuser-1 and Accuser-2 in the United States.\nTo the extent there is any doubt about the scope of the alleged conspiratorial agreement, or how the allegations relating to Accuser-3 are within the scope of that agreement, the Court can resolve the issue by ordering a bill of particulars on these points, as the court did in Hsia.\nHowever, if the government cannot articulate how alleged sexual conduct with a person who never traveled falls within the scope of a conspiracy to cause another individual to travel, then allegations concerning Accuser-3 should be stricken.",
  20. "position": "top"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "C. The Allegations Regarding Accuser-3 Are Unduly Prejudicial to Ms. Maxwell.",
  25. "position": "middle"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "There can be no legitimate dispute that the allegations regarding Accuser-3 are inflammatory and unduly prejudicial to Ms. Maxwell. The indictment alleges that Epstein \"sexually abused\" Accuser-3 and that Ms. Maxwell encouraged Accuser-3 to massage Epstein, \"knowing that Epstein intended to sexually abuse\" Accuser-3. Indictment ¶¶ 7c, 11d, 17d. The phrase \"sexual abuse\" connotes criminal activity, even though the alleged conduct may well have been lawful: Accuser-3 was at or above the legal age of consent in England at all relevant times, and the indictment contains no suggestion that the alleged sexual activity involving Accuser-3 was nonconsensual. Regardless of whether the conduct was lawful or unlawful in England, however, few allegations could be more prejudicial to a defendant than allegations that she participated in the \"sexual abuse\" of a teenager. The allegations as to Accuser-3, though irrelevant to the government's conspiracy counts, thus create precisely the prejudicial appearance the government seeks.",
  30. "position": "middle"
  31. },
  32. {
  33. "type": "printed",
  34. "content": "Because the allegations as to Accuser-3 are both irrelevant to the charges against Ms. Maxwell and unduly prejudicial, they should be stricken as surplusage.",
  35. "position": "bottom"
  36. },
  37. {
  38. "type": "printed",
  39. "content": "9",
  40. "position": "footer"
  41. },
  42. {
  43. "type": "printed",
  44. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00002688",
  45. "position": "footer"
  46. }
  47. ],
  48. "entities": {
  49. "people": [
  50. "Accuser-1",
  51. "Accuser-2",
  52. "Accuser-3",
  53. "Ms. Maxwell",
  54. "Epstein",
  55. "Hsia"
  56. ],
  57. "organizations": [],
  58. "locations": [
  59. "England",
  60. "United States"
  61. ],
  62. "dates": [
  63. "02/04/21"
  64. ],
  65. "reference_numbers": [
  66. "1:20-cr-00330-AJN",
  67. "Document 146",
  68. "DOJ-OGR-00002688"
  69. ]
  70. },
  71. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, discussing the allegations against her and the potential prejudice caused by certain allegations."
  72. }