DOJ-OGR-00002868.json 5.0 KB

1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253545556575859606162636465666768697071727374757677787980
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "2",
  4. "document_number": "188",
  5. "date": "03/29/21",
  6. "document_type": "court document",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 188 Filed 03/29/21 Page 2 of 5\nPage 2\nI. Comparison of the S1 Indictment and the S2 Indictment\nCount One of the S2 Indictment charges the defendant with participating in a conspiracy to entice minors to travel, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, which is the same statutory violation as Count One of the S1 Indictment. Whereas Count One of the S1 Indictment alleged that this conspiracy lasted through in or about 1997, Count One of the S2 Indictment alleges that the conspiracy continued through in or about 2004 and specifically identifies a fourth victim, Minor Victim-4, who was a victim of this conspiracy between approximately 2001 and 2004.\nCount Two of the S2 Indictment remains identical to Count Two of the S1 Indictment and is unchanged.\nCount Three of the S2 Indictment charges the defendant with participating in a conspiracy to transport minors, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, which is the same statutory violation as Count Three of the S1 Indictment. Whereas Count Three of the S1 Indictment alleged that this conspiracy lasted through in or about 1997, Count Three of the S2 Indictment alleges that the conspiracy continued through in or about 2004 and specifically identifies a fourth victim, Minor Victim-4, who was a victim of this conspiracy between approximately 2001 and 2004.\nCount Four of the S2 Indictment remains identical to Count Four of the S1 Indictment and is unchanged.\nCount Five of the S2 Indictment adds a new charge against the defendant. In particular, Count Five alleges that the defendant participated in a sex trafficking conspiracy between approximately 2001 and 2004, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. The S2 Indictment specifically identifies Minor Victim-4 as a victim of this conspiracy.\nDOJ-OGR-00002868",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 188 Filed 03/29/21 Page 2 of 5",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "Page 2",
  20. "position": "header"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "I. Comparison of the S1 Indictment and the S2 Indictment",
  25. "position": "top"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "Count One of the S2 Indictment charges the defendant with participating in a conspiracy to entice minors to travel, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, which is the same statutory violation as Count One of the S1 Indictment. Whereas Count One of the S1 Indictment alleged that this conspiracy lasted through in or about 1997, Count One of the S2 Indictment alleges that the conspiracy continued through in or about 2004 and specifically identifies a fourth victim, Minor Victim-4, who was a victim of this conspiracy between approximately 2001 and 2004.",
  30. "position": "middle"
  31. },
  32. {
  33. "type": "printed",
  34. "content": "Count Two of the S2 Indictment remains identical to Count Two of the S1 Indictment and is unchanged.",
  35. "position": "middle"
  36. },
  37. {
  38. "type": "printed",
  39. "content": "Count Three of the S2 Indictment charges the defendant with participating in a conspiracy to transport minors, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, which is the same statutory violation as Count Three of the S1 Indictment. Whereas Count Three of the S1 Indictment alleged that this conspiracy lasted through in or about 1997, Count Three of the S2 Indictment alleges that the conspiracy continued through in or about 2004 and specifically identifies a fourth victim, Minor Victim-4, who was a victim of this conspiracy between approximately 2001 and 2004.",
  40. "position": "middle"
  41. },
  42. {
  43. "type": "printed",
  44. "content": "Count Four of the S2 Indictment remains identical to Count Four of the S1 Indictment and is unchanged.",
  45. "position": "middle"
  46. },
  47. {
  48. "type": "printed",
  49. "content": "Count Five of the S2 Indictment adds a new charge against the defendant. In particular, Count Five alleges that the defendant participated in a sex trafficking conspiracy between approximately 2001 and 2004, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. The S2 Indictment specifically identifies Minor Victim-4 as a victim of this conspiracy.",
  50. "position": "middle"
  51. },
  52. {
  53. "type": "printed",
  54. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00002868",
  55. "position": "footer"
  56. }
  57. ],
  58. "entities": {
  59. "people": [
  60. "Minor Victim-4",
  61. "defendant"
  62. ],
  63. "organizations": [
  64. "DOJ"
  65. ],
  66. "locations": [],
  67. "dates": [
  68. "03/29/21",
  69. "1997",
  70. "2004",
  71. "2001"
  72. ],
  73. "reference_numbers": [
  74. "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
  75. "Document 188",
  76. "DOJ-OGR-00002868"
  77. ]
  78. },
  79. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing comparing two indictments. The text is printed and there are no visible stamps or handwritten notes. The document is well-formatted and legible."
  80. }