DOJ-OGR-00002937.json 9.1 KB

12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "3",
  4. "document_number": "204",
  5. "date": "04/16/21",
  6. "document_type": "court document",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 204 Filed 04/16/21 Page 3 of 239\nc. Chief Judge McMahon's Memorandum and Order ............................71\n7. Magistrate Judge Netburn's Order ....................................................74\n8. Unsealing of Maxwell's Depositions .......................................................74\n9. The New York Daily News Article .........................................................75\nB. The Defendant's Suppression Motion Should Be Denied ........................76\n1. Martindell Provides No Basis to Grant the Relief the Defendant Seeks ........76\na. Applicable Law ...............................................................................76\nb. Discussion .....................................................................................79\n2. Maxwell's Fourth Amendment Claim Fails ...............................................82\na. Maxwell Has Not Established Standing............................................82\ni. Applicable Law .......................................................................82\nii. Discussion ...............................................................................84\nb. The Government Acted in Good Faith................................................86\ni. Applicable Law .......................................................................86\nii. Discussion ...............................................................................88\nc. Suppression of Certain Materials Would Be Improper Under the Inevitable Discovery Doctrine...............................................................................................93\ni. Applicable Law .......................................................................93\nii. Discussion ...............................................................................94\n3. The Defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence Obtained Pursuant to the Subpoena Under the Fifth Amendment Is Without Merit .......................................96\na. Applicable Law ...............................................................................96\ni. The Fifth Amendment - Generally ................................................96\nii. The Fifth Amendment - Act of Production Privilege .......................97\niii. The Fifth Amendment - When Private Action Is Deemed Government Action ......98\nb. Discussion .....................................................................................99\n4. The Government Did Not Violate Maxwell's Due Process Rights....................103\na. Applicable Law .............................................................................104\nb. Discussion ...................................................................................107\n5. The Court Should Not Exercise Its Inherent Authority to Order Suppression ....109\na. Applicable Law .............................................................................109\nb. Discussion ...................................................................................110\n6. The Defendant Is Not Entitled to a Hearing...........................................111\na. Applicable Law .............................................................................112\nb. Discussion ...................................................................................115\nV. The Jury Should Decide Whether the Defendant Committed Perjury....................116\nA. Factual Background ...............................................................................117\nB. Applicable Law ....................................................................................119\nC. Discussion ...........................................................................................122\n1. April 2016 Deposition ...........................................................................123\n2. July 2016 Deposition.............................................................................129\n3. Materiality ........................................................................................135\nii\nDOJ-OGR-00002937",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 204 Filed 04/16/21 Page 3 of 239",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "c. Chief Judge McMahon's Memorandum and Order ............................71\n7. Magistrate Judge Netburn's Order ....................................................74\n8. Unsealing of Maxwell's Depositions .......................................................74\n9. The New York Daily News Article .........................................................75\nB. The Defendant's Suppression Motion Should Be Denied ........................76\n1. Martindell Provides No Basis to Grant the Relief the Defendant Seeks ........76\na. Applicable Law ...............................................................................76\nb. Discussion .....................................................................................79\n2. Maxwell's Fourth Amendment Claim Fails ...............................................82\na. Maxwell Has Not Established Standing............................................82\ni. Applicable Law .......................................................................82\nii. Discussion ...............................................................................84\nb. The Government Acted in Good Faith................................................86\ni. Applicable Law .......................................................................86\nii. Discussion ...............................................................................88\nc. Suppression of Certain Materials Would Be Improper Under the Inevitable Discovery Doctrine...............................................................................................93\ni. Applicable Law .......................................................................93\nii. Discussion ...............................................................................94\n3. The Defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence Obtained Pursuant to the Subpoena Under the Fifth Amendment Is Without Merit .......................................96\na. Applicable Law ...............................................................................96\ni. The Fifth Amendment - Generally ................................................96\nii. The Fifth Amendment - Act of Production Privilege .......................97\niii. The Fifth Amendment - When Private Action Is Deemed Government Action ......98\nb. Discussion .....................................................................................99\n4. The Government Did Not Violate Maxwell's Due Process Rights....................103\na. Applicable Law .............................................................................104\nb. Discussion ...................................................................................107\n5. The Court Should Not Exercise Its Inherent Authority to Order Suppression ....109\na. Applicable Law .............................................................................109\nb. Discussion ...................................................................................110\n6. The Defendant Is Not Entitled to a Hearing...........................................111\na. Applicable Law .............................................................................112\nb. Discussion ...................................................................................115\nV. The Jury Should Decide Whether the Defendant Committed Perjury....................116\nA. Factual Background ...............................................................................117\nB. Applicable Law ....................................................................................119\nC. Discussion ...........................................................................................122\n1. April 2016 Deposition ...........................................................................123\n2. July 2016 Deposition.............................................................................129\n3. Materiality ........................................................................................135",
  20. "position": "main content"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "ii",
  25. "position": "footer"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00002937",
  30. "position": "footer"
  31. }
  32. ],
  33. "entities": {
  34. "people": [
  35. "McMahon",
  36. "Netburn",
  37. "Maxwell"
  38. ],
  39. "organizations": [
  40. "New York Daily News",
  41. "DOJ"
  42. ],
  43. "locations": [
  44. "New York"
  45. ],
  46. "dates": [
  47. "04/16/21",
  48. "April 2016",
  49. "July 2016"
  50. ],
  51. "reference_numbers": [
  52. "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
  53. "Document 204",
  54. "DOJ-OGR-00002937"
  55. ]
  56. },
  57. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to a criminal case. The content is a table of contents for a legal brief or memorandum. There are no visible redactions or damage to the document."
  58. }