| 12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061 |
- {
- "document_metadata": {
- "page_number": "15",
- "document_number": "204-3",
- "date": "04/16/21",
- "document_type": "Table of Contents",
- "has_handwriting": false,
- "has_stamps": false
- },
- "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 204-3 Filed 04/16/21 Page 15 of 348\n\nTABLE OF CONTENTS\n\nEXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................... i\nI. OVERVIEW OF FACTUAL BACKGROUND ............................................................................................... i\nII. THE INITIATION AND SCOPE OF OPR'S INVESTIGATION....................................................................... v\nIII. OVERVIEW OF OPR'S ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK ............................................................................... vii\nIV. ISSUES CONSIDERED ........................................................................................................................ viii\n A. The Negotiation, Execution, and Implementation of the NPA ........................................................ viii\n B. The District Court's Conclusion That the USAO Violated the CVRA ................................................ ix\nV. OPR'S FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS .................................................................................................... ix\n A. Findings and Conclusions Relating to the NPA ................................................................................ ix\n B. Findings and Conclusions Relating to the Government's Interactions with Victims ....................... x\nVI. ORGANIZATION OF THE REPORT ........................................................................................................ xii\nCHAPTER ONE: SIGNIFICANT ENTITIES AND INDIVIDUALS ....................................................................... 1\nI. THE FEDERAL AND LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES ................................................................ 1\n A. The Department of Justice, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation ........................................................................................................................ 1\n B. The State and Local Law Enforcement Agencies ............................................................................... 4\nII. THE SUBJECT ATTORNEYS AND THEIR ROLES IN THE EPSTEIN CASE ................................................ 4\nIII. JEFFREY EPSTEIN AND HIS DEFENSE ATTORNEYS .............................................................................. 8\n A. Jeffrey Epstein ................................................................................................................................ 8\n B. Epstein's Defense Attorneys ............................................................................................................. 8\nCHAPTER TWO: THE NON-PROSECUTION AGREEMENT ........................................................................ 11\nPART ONE: FACTUAL BACKGROUND ..................................................................................................... 11\nI. OVERVIEW ....................................................................................................................................... 11\nII. MARCH 2005 - MAY 2006: EPSTEIN IS INVESTIGATED BY THE PALM BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT AND THE PALM BEACH COUNTY STATE ATTORNEY'S OFFICE ........................................................................................................................ 11\n A. The Initial Allegations and the PBPD Investigation ...................................................................... 11\n B. The State Attorney's Office Decides to Present the Case to a State Grand Jury ............................... 14\n C. Florida State Procedure for Bringing Criminal Charges ................................................................ 15\n D. PBPD Chief Reiter Becomes Concerned with the State Attorney's Office's Handling of the State Investigation and Seeks a Federal Investigation ....................................................................................... 16\nxiii\nDOJ-OGR-00003191",
- "text_blocks": [
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 204-3 Filed 04/16/21 Page 15 of 348",
- "position": "header"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "TABLE OF CONTENTS",
- "position": "top"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................... i\nI. OVERVIEW OF FACTUAL BACKGROUND ............................................................................................... i\nII. THE INITIATION AND SCOPE OF OPR'S INVESTIGATION....................................................................... v\nIII. OVERVIEW OF OPR'S ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK ............................................................................... vii\nIV. ISSUES CONSIDERED ........................................................................................................................ viii\n A. The Negotiation, Execution, and Implementation of the NPA ........................................................ viii\n B. The District Court's Conclusion That the USAO Violated the CVRA ................................................ ix\nV. OPR'S FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS .................................................................................................... ix\n A. Findings and Conclusions Relating to the NPA ................................................................................ ix\n B. Findings and Conclusions Relating to the Government's Interactions with Victims ....................... x\nVI. ORGANIZATION OF THE REPORT ........................................................................................................ xii\nCHAPTER ONE: SIGNIFICANT ENTITIES AND INDIVIDUALS ....................................................................... 1\nI. THE FEDERAL AND LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES ................................................................ 1\n A. The Department of Justice, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation ........................................................................................................................ 1\n B. The State and Local Law Enforcement Agencies ............................................................................... 4\nII. THE SUBJECT ATTORNEYS AND THEIR ROLES IN THE EPSTEIN CASE ................................................ 4\nIII. JEFFREY EPSTEIN AND HIS DEFENSE ATTORNEYS .............................................................................. 8\n A. Jeffrey Epstein ................................................................................................................................ 8\n B. Epstein's Defense Attorneys ............................................................................................................. 8\nCHAPTER TWO: THE NON-PROSECUTION AGREEMENT ........................................................................ 11\nPART ONE: FACTUAL BACKGROUND ..................................................................................................... 11\nI. OVERVIEW ....................................................................................................................................... 11\nII. MARCH 2005 - MAY 2006: EPSTEIN IS INVESTIGATED BY THE PALM BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT AND THE PALM BEACH COUNTY STATE ATTORNEY'S OFFICE ........................................................................................................................ 11\n A. The Initial Allegations and the PBPD Investigation ...................................................................... 11\n B. The State Attorney's Office Decides to Present the Case to a State Grand Jury ............................... 14\n C. Florida State Procedure for Bringing Criminal Charges ................................................................ 15\n D. PBPD Chief Reiter Becomes Concerned with the State Attorney's Office's Handling of the State Investigation and Seeks a Federal Investigation ....................................................................................... 16",
- "position": "middle"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "xiii\nDOJ-OGR-00003191",
- "position": "footer"
- }
- ],
- "entities": {
- "people": [
- "Jeffrey Epstein"
- ],
- "organizations": [
- "Department of Justice",
- "U.S. Attorney's Office",
- "Federal Bureau of Investigation",
- "Palm Beach Police Department",
- "Palm Beach County State Attorney's Office"
- ],
- "locations": [
- "Southern District of Florida",
- "Palm Beach",
- "Florida"
- ],
- "dates": [
- "04/16/21",
- "March 2005",
- "May 2006"
- ],
- "reference_numbers": [
- "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
- "204-3",
- "DOJ-OGR-00003191"
- ]
- },
- "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a table of contents for a report related to the Jeffrey Epstein case. The report is divided into chapters and sections, and includes references to various law enforcement agencies and individuals involved in the case."
- }
|