mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00003591.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "250",
    "document_number": "1:20-cv-00233",
    "date": "10/22/2021",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cv-00233-IPAP Document 1207-10 Filed 10/22/21 Page 250 of 455\nPage 250\n1 G Maxwell - Confidential\n2 agree to that?\n3 MR. PAGLIUCA: Objection to the\n4 form and foundation.\n5 Q. Are they under the age of 18?\n6 A. We already established that you can\n7 be a masseuse in Florida at age 17. That\n8 does not make it inappropriate.\n9 A. I'm not saying appropriate or\n10 inappropriate. I'm just asking if there were\n11 any exercise instructors that were under the\n12 age of 18.\n13 A. I am not aware if anybody was but I\n14 don't want to full out and say you on she\n15 said, we already established you can be a 17\n16 year old masseuse and have it not be\n17 something that is not appropriate. So when\n18 you say that and then you go, well, you come\n19 back and say something, now we can establish\n20 that Virginia was 17 but you can be a 17 year\n21 old legal masseuse, but I am not aware to\n22 your point.\n23 Q. Who were the other 17 year old\n24 masseuses that you were aware of?\n25 A. I am not aware of any.\nMAGNA LEGAL SERVICES\nDOJ-OGR-00003591",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cv-00233-IPAP Document 1207-10 Filed 10/22/21 Page 250 of 455",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Page 250",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 G Maxwell - Confidential\n2 agree to that?\n3 MR. PAGLIUCA: Objection to the\n4 form and foundation.\n5 Q. Are they under the age of 18?\n6 A. We already established that you can\n7 be a masseuse in Florida at age 17. That\n8 does not make it inappropriate.\n9 A. I'm not saying appropriate or\n10 inappropriate. I'm just asking if there were\n11 any exercise instructors that were under the\n12 age of 18.\n13 A. I am not aware if anybody was but I\n14 don't want to full out and say you on she\n15 said, we already established you can be a 17\n16 year old masseuse and have it not be\n17 something that is not appropriate. So when\n18 you say that and then you go, well, you come\n19 back and say something, now we can establish\n20 that Virginia was 17 but you can be a 17 year\n21 old legal masseuse, but I am not aware to\n22 your point.\n23 Q. Who were the other 17 year old\n24 masseuses that you were aware of?\n25 A. I am not aware of any.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "MAGNA LEGAL SERVICES",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00003591",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "G Maxwell",
      "MR. PAGLIUCA",
      "Virginia"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "MAGNA LEGAL SERVICES"
    ],
    "locations": [
      "Florida"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "10/22/2021"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cv-00233",
      "DOJ-OGR-00003591"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. The content discusses the age of masseuses in Florida and their appropriateness. There are no visible redactions or damage to the document."
}