mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00003654.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "2 of 22",
    "document_number": "206",
    "date": "04/16/21",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 206 Filed 04/16/21 Page 2 of 22 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. The 2003 Amendment Does Not Apply Retroactively............................................... 2 A. Step One: Congress Did Not Expressly Prescribe Retroactivity and Rejected a Proposal to Do So....................................................... 3 1. Congress' explicit rejection of a retroactivity provision ends the inquiry at step one in Ms. Maxwell's favor ................................ 3 2. Cases applying the 2003 Amendment retroactively are readily distinguishable............................................................... 5 3. The government cannot prevail at step one ................................ 7 B. Step Two: Application of the 2003 Amendment to Ms. Maxwell's Alleged Offenses Would Have Impermissible Effects................................ 8 II. Section 3283 Does Not Apply at All ....................................................... 10 A. Section 3283 Applies Only to Offenses that Necessarily Entail the Sexual Abuse or Physical Abuse, or Kidnapping, of a Child................... 11 B. The Offenses Charged in Counts One Through Four Do Not Necessarily Entail the Sexual or Physical Abuse or Kidnapping of a Child................ 14 CONCLUSION................................................................................ 16 i DOJ-OGR-00003654",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 206 Filed 04/16/21 Page 2 of 22",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "TABLE OF CONTENTS",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "I. The 2003 Amendment Does Not Apply Retroactively............................................... 2 A. Step One: Congress Did Not Expressly Prescribe Retroactivity and Rejected a Proposal to Do So....................................................... 3 1. Congress' explicit rejection of a retroactivity provision ends the inquiry at step one in Ms. Maxwell's favor ................................ 3 2. Cases applying the 2003 Amendment retroactively are readily distinguishable............................................................... 5 3. The government cannot prevail at step one ................................ 7 B. Step Two: Application of the 2003 Amendment to Ms. Maxwell's Alleged Offenses Would Have Impermissible Effects................................ 8 II. Section 3283 Does Not Apply at All ....................................................... 10 A. Section 3283 Applies Only to Offenses that Necessarily Entail the Sexual Abuse or Physical Abuse, or Kidnapping, of a Child................... 11 B. The Offenses Charged in Counts One Through Four Do Not Necessarily Entail the Sexual or Physical Abuse or Kidnapping of a Child................ 14 CONCLUSION................................................................................ 16",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "i DOJ-OGR-00003654",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ms. Maxwell"
    ],
    "organizations": [],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "04/16/21"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "206",
      "DOJ-OGR-00003654"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to the case of Ms. Maxwell. The table of contents outlines the arguments presented in the document, including the applicability of the 2003 Amendment and Section 3283. The document is well-formatted and free of handwritten text or stamps."
}