mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00003731.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "7",
    "document_number": "208-1",
    "date": "04/16/2021",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Jane Doe #3, in violation of her rights under the CVRA\" (id. at 3); and \"The Government was well aware of Jane Doe #3 when it was negotiating the NPA, as it listed her as a victim in the attachment to the NPA\" (id. at 6). As none of Jane Doe 4's factual details relate to non-parties, the Court finds it unnecessary to strike the portion of the Rule 21 Motion related to her circumstances. Regarding the Declaration in support of Petitioners' response to Mr. Dershowitz's motion to intervene (DE 291-1), the Court shall strike paragraphs 4, 5, 7, 11, 13, 15, 19 through 53, and 59, as they contain impertinent details regarding non-parties. Regarding the Declaration of Jane Doe 3 in support of the Rule 21 Motion (DE310-1), the Court shall strike paragraphs 7 through 12, 16, 39, and 49, as they contain impertinent details regarding non-parties. Jane Doe 3 is free to reassert these factual details through proper evidentiary proof, should Petitioners demonstrate a good faith basis for believing that such details are pertinent to a matter presented for the Court's consideration. As mentioned, Mr. Dershowitz moves to intervene \"for the limited purposes of moving to strike the outrageous and impertinent allegations made against him and requesting a show cause order to the attorneys that have made them.\" (DE 282 at 1). As the Court has taken it upon itself to strike the impertinent factual details from the Rule 21 Motion and related filings, the Court concludes that Mr. Dershowitz's intervention in this case is unnecessary. Accordingly, his motion to intervene will be denied as moot.3 Regarding whether a show cause order should This also moots Mr. Dershowitz's Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Reply in Support of Motion for Limited Intervention. (DE 317). Denying Mr. Dershowitz's motion to intervene also renders moot Petitioners' motion (DE 292) to file a sealed document supporting its response to Mr. Dershowitz's motion. It will accordingly be denied as moot, and DE 293 (the sealed response) will be stricken from the record. 6 GIUFFRE002849 DOJ-OGR-00003731",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Jane Doe #3, in violation of her rights under the CVRA\" (id. at 3); and \"The Government was well aware of Jane Doe #3 when it was negotiating the NPA, as it listed her as a victim in the attachment to the NPA\" (id. at 6). As none of Jane Doe 4's factual details relate to non-parties, the Court finds it unnecessary to strike the portion of the Rule 21 Motion related to her circumstances. Regarding the Declaration in support of Petitioners' response to Mr. Dershowitz's motion to intervene (DE 291-1), the Court shall strike paragraphs 4, 5, 7, 11, 13, 15, 19 through 53, and 59, as they contain impertinent details regarding non-parties. Regarding the Declaration of Jane Doe 3 in support of the Rule 21 Motion (DE310-1), the Court shall strike paragraphs 7 through 12, 16, 39, and 49, as they contain impertinent details regarding non-parties. Jane Doe 3 is free to reassert these factual details through proper evidentiary proof, should Petitioners demonstrate a good faith basis for believing that such details are pertinent to a matter presented for the Court's consideration.",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "As mentioned, Mr. Dershowitz moves to intervene \"for the limited purposes of moving to strike the outrageous and impertinent allegations made against him and requesting a show cause order to the attorneys that have made them.\" (DE 282 at 1). As the Court has taken it upon itself to strike the impertinent factual details from the Rule 21 Motion and related filings, the Court concludes that Mr. Dershowitz's intervention in this case is unnecessary. Accordingly, his motion to intervene will be denied as moot.3 Regarding whether a show cause order should",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "This also moots Mr. Dershowitz's Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Reply in Support of Motion for Limited Intervention. (DE 317). Denying Mr. Dershowitz's motion to intervene also renders moot Petitioners' motion (DE 292) to file a sealed document supporting its response to Mr. Dershowitz's motion. It will accordingly be denied as moot, and DE 293 (the sealed response) will be stricken from the record.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "6",
      "position": "bottom"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "GIUFFRE002849 DOJ-OGR-00003731",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Jane Doe #3",
      "Jane Doe 4",
      "Mr. Dershowitz"
    ],
    "organizations": [],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "04/16/2021"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "DE 291-1",
      "DE310-1",
      "DE 282",
      "DE 317",
      "DE 292",
      "DE 293",
      "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 208-1 Filed 04/16/21 Page 7 of 11"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to a case involving Jane Doe #3 and Mr. Dershowitz. The text is mostly printed, with some footer text that seems to be a unique identifier or filing information."
}