mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00003824.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "22",
    "document_number": "212-2",
    "date": "04/16/21",
    "document_type": "Court Transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 212-2 Filed 04/16/21 Page 22 of 30\nApp.-0825\nG4LMGIUC 21\n1 The criminal investigation. Any materials that the\n2 plaintiff has with respect to any criminal investigations will\n3 be turned over except for any statements made by the plaintiff\n4 to law enforcement authority and those statements, if there are\n5 such, will be submitted in camera, and I will review them.\n6 I hope that clears up our problems. Tell me if I have\n7 failed in my effort to do so. Yes, ma'am.\n8 MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, two quick things, I think.\n9 With respect to medical records, we also certainly believe that\n10 the period from the time the statement was made in January 2015\n11 until the present, because she has claimed emotional distress\n12 from that defamation --\n13 THE COURT: Sure, yes.\n14 MS. MENNINGER: The problem is, we have asked through\n15 interrogatory what were the names of the medical providers\n16 because they have not disclosed who her medical providers were.\n17 So there is no way for us to tell whether the records in fact\n18 have been sought from and produced with respect to each of\n19 those medical providers. I will say that other records in the\n20 possession of plaintiff lists other doctors who they have not\n21 asked for records from or releases.\n22 THE COURT: Let's see if we can clear that up.\n23 MS. McCAWLEY: We have disclosed the names. She has\n24 those names. We have also disclosed records, the more recent\n25 records. We have not contested that.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00003824",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 212-2 Filed 04/16/21 Page 22 of 30",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "App.-0825",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "G4LMGIUC 21\n1 The criminal investigation. Any materials that the\n2 plaintiff has with respect to any criminal investigations will\n3 be turned over except for any statements made by the plaintiff\n4 to law enforcement authority and those statements, if there are\n5 such, will be submitted in camera, and I will review them.\n6 I hope that clears up our problems. Tell me if I have\n7 failed in my effort to do so. Yes, ma'am.\n8 MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, two quick things, I think.\n9 With respect to medical records, we also certainly believe that\n10 the period from the time the statement was made in January 2015\n11 until the present, because she has claimed emotional distress\n12 from that defamation --\n13 THE COURT: Sure, yes.\n14 MS. MENNINGER: The problem is, we have asked through\n15 interrogatory what were the names of the medical providers\n16 because they have not disclosed who her medical providers were.\n17 So there is no way for us to tell whether the records in fact\n18 have been sought from and produced with respect to each of\n19 those medical providers. I will say that other records in the\n20 possession of plaintiff lists other doctors who they have not\n21 asked for records from or releases.\n22 THE COURT: Let's see if we can clear that up.\n23 MS. McCAWLEY: We have disclosed the names. She has\n24 those names. We have also disclosed records, the more recent\n25 records. We have not contested that.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00003824",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MS. MENNINGER",
      "MS. McCAWLEY"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "January 2015",
      "04/16/21"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "212-2",
      "App.-0825",
      "DOJ-OGR-00003824"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}