mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00003852.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "6",
    "document_number": "217",
    "date": "04/19/2021",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": true,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 217 Filed 04/19/21 Page 6 of 6 The Hon. Alison J. Nathan April 1, 2021 Page 6 standard to redact the portions of pages 129 to 134 of the Government's omnibus memorandum of law and Exhibit 11 that refer to language that is contained in the publicly-filed Indictment is part of the public record The information in the Indictment is public and, therefore, has a deeply diminished privacy interest. The Government does not understand any legal basis for sealing the information again. The Government does not object to the remaining proposed redactions to pages 129 to 134 of the Government's brief, which were the redactions originally proposed by the Government. The Government does not object to the redactions proposed by the defense to Exhibit 11 (with the exception of the language quoted in the Indictment). Respectfully submitted, Laura A. Menninger CC: Counsel of Record",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 217 Filed 04/19/21 Page 6 of 6",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "The Hon. Alison J. Nathan April 1, 2021 Page 6",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "standard to redact the portions of pages 129 to 134 of the Government's omnibus memorandum of law and Exhibit 11 that refer to language that is contained in the publicly-filed Indictment is part of the public record The information in the Indictment is public and, therefore, has a deeply diminished privacy interest. The Government does not understand any legal basis for sealing the information again. The Government does not object to the remaining proposed redactions to pages 129 to 134 of the Government's brief, which were the redactions originally proposed by the Government. The Government does not object to the redactions proposed by the defense to Exhibit 11 (with the exception of the language quoted in the Indictment).",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Respectfully submitted,",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "handwritten",
      "content": "G.",
      "position": "signature"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Laura A. Menninger",
      "position": "signature block"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "CC: Counsel of Record",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Alison J. Nathan",
      "Laura A. Menninger"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "Government"
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "04/19/2021",
      "April 1, 2021"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "Document 217"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing with a handwritten signature. The text is mostly printed, with some formatting indicating a formal legal document."
}