DOJ-OGR-00003900.json 9.8 KB

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "3",
  4. "document_number": "224",
  5. "date": "04/20/21",
  6. "document_type": "TABLE OF AUTHORITIES",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 224 Filed 04/20/21 Page 3 of 17\n\nTABLE OF AUTHORITIES\n\nCases\n\nGiuffre v. Maxwell, 325 F. Supp. 3d 428 (S.D.N.Y. 2018) .............................................................................................................................7\nUnited States v. Blakney, 941 F.2d 114 (2d Cir.1991) ...............................................................................................................................1\nUnited States v. Broccolo, 797 F. Supp. 1185 (S.D.N.Y. 1992)....................................................................................................................3\nUnited States v. Burke, 789 F. Supp. 2d 395 (S.D.N.Y. 2011)......................................................................................................................5\nUnited States v. Cohn, 230 F. Supp. 587 (S.D.N.Y. 1964)..........................................................................................................................4\nUnited States v. Cunningham, 672 F.2d 1064 (2d Cir. 1982) ......................................................................................................................10\nUnited States v. Gotti, 771 F. Supp. 552 (E.D.N.Y. 1991) ........................................................................................................................10\nUnited States v. Halper, 590 F.2d 422 (2d Cir. 1978) ...............................................................................................................................6\nUnited States v. Harris, 805 F. Supp. 166 (S.D.N.Y. 1992) .......................................................................................................................4\nUnited States v. Littlefield, 840 F.2d 143 (1st Cir. 1988) ..........................................................................................................................6\nUnited States v. Potamitis, 739 F.2d 784 (2d Cir. 1984) ...........................................................................................................................3\nUnited States v. Randazzo, 80 F.3d 623 (1st Cir. 1996) ............................................................................................................................2\nUnited States v. Ruiz, 894 F.2d 501 (2d Cir.1990) ................................................................................................................................1, 3\nUnited States v. Sweig, 441 F.2d 114 (2d Cir. 1971) ...............................................................................................................................3\nUnited States v. Werner, 620 F.2d 922 (2d Cir. 1980) .............................................................................................................................3\nWilliams v. Dist. Ct., El Paso Cty., 700 P.2d 549 (Colo. 1985) ...................................................................................................................10\n\nOther Authorities\n\nErick G. Luna, Avoiding A \"Carnival Atmosphere\": Trial Court Discretion and the Advocate-Witness Rule, 18 Whittier L.Rev. 447, 451 (1997) .......................................................................................................................................................................................9\nJeffrey A. Van Detta, Lawyers as Investigators: How Ellerth and Faragher Reveal a Crisis of Ethics and Professionalism Through Trial Counsel Disqualification and Waivers of Privilege in Workplace Harassment Cases, 24 J. Legal Prof. 261 (2000).......................................................................................................................................................................................9\nii DOJ-OGR-00003900",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 224 Filed 04/20/21 Page 3 of 17",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "TABLE OF AUTHORITIES",
  20. "position": "header"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "Cases",
  25. "position": "top"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "Giuffre v. Maxwell, 325 F. Supp. 3d 428 (S.D.N.Y. 2018) .............................................................................................................................7\nUnited States v. Blakney, 941 F.2d 114 (2d Cir.1991) ...............................................................................................................................1\nUnited States v. Broccolo, 797 F. Supp. 1185 (S.D.N.Y. 1992)....................................................................................................................3\nUnited States v. Burke, 789 F. Supp. 2d 395 (S.D.N.Y. 2011)......................................................................................................................5\nUnited States v. Cohn, 230 F. Supp. 587 (S.D.N.Y. 1964)..........................................................................................................................4\nUnited States v. Cunningham, 672 F.2d 1064 (2d Cir. 1982) ......................................................................................................................10\nUnited States v. Gotti, 771 F. Supp. 552 (E.D.N.Y. 1991) ........................................................................................................................10\nUnited States v. Halper, 590 F.2d 422 (2d Cir. 1978) ...............................................................................................................................6\nUnited States v. Harris, 805 F. Supp. 166 (S.D.N.Y. 1992) .......................................................................................................................4\nUnited States v. Littlefield, 840 F.2d 143 (1st Cir. 1988) ..........................................................................................................................6\nUnited States v. Potamitis, 739 F.2d 784 (2d Cir. 1984) ...........................................................................................................................3\nUnited States v. Randazzo, 80 F.3d 623 (1st Cir. 1996) ............................................................................................................................2\nUnited States v. Ruiz, 894 F.2d 501 (2d Cir.1990) ................................................................................................................................1, 3\nUnited States v. Sweig, 441 F.2d 114 (2d Cir. 1971) ...............................................................................................................................3\nUnited States v. Werner, 620 F.2d 922 (2d Cir. 1980) .............................................................................................................................3\nWilliams v. Dist. Ct., El Paso Cty., 700 P.2d 549 (Colo. 1985) ...................................................................................................................10",
  30. "position": "middle"
  31. },
  32. {
  33. "type": "printed",
  34. "content": "Other Authorities",
  35. "position": "middle"
  36. },
  37. {
  38. "type": "printed",
  39. "content": "Erick G. Luna, Avoiding A \"Carnival Atmosphere\": Trial Court Discretion and the Advocate-Witness Rule, 18 Whittier L.Rev. 447, 451 (1997) .......................................................................................................................................................................................9\nJeffrey A. Van Detta, Lawyers as Investigators: How Ellerth and Faragher Reveal a Crisis of Ethics and Professionalism Through Trial Counsel Disqualification and Waivers of Privilege in Workplace Harassment Cases, 24 J. Legal Prof. 261 (2000).......................................................................................................................................................................................9",
  40. "position": "middle"
  41. },
  42. {
  43. "type": "printed",
  44. "content": "ii DOJ-OGR-00003900",
  45. "position": "footer"
  46. }
  47. ],
  48. "entities": {
  49. "people": [
  50. "Giuffre",
  51. "Maxwell",
  52. "Blakney",
  53. "Broccolo",
  54. "Burke",
  55. "Cohn",
  56. "Cunningham",
  57. "Gotti",
  58. "Halper",
  59. "Harris",
  60. "Littlefield",
  61. "Potamitis",
  62. "Randazzo",
  63. "Ruiz",
  64. "Sweig",
  65. "Werner",
  66. "Williams",
  67. "Erick G. Luna",
  68. "Jeffrey A. Van Detta"
  69. ],
  70. "organizations": [
  71. "United States",
  72. "District Court"
  73. ],
  74. "locations": [
  75. "New York",
  76. "Colorado",
  77. "El Paso County"
  78. ],
  79. "dates": [
  80. "2018",
  81. "1991",
  82. "1992",
  83. "2011",
  84. "1964",
  85. "1982",
  86. "1978",
  87. "1990",
  88. "1984",
  89. "1996",
  90. "1971",
  91. "1980",
  92. "1985",
  93. "1997",
  94. "2000",
  95. "04/20/21"
  96. ],
  97. "reference_numbers": [
  98. "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
  99. "Document 224",
  100. "325 F. Supp. 3d 428",
  101. "941 F.2d 114",
  102. "797 F. Supp. 1185",
  103. "789 F. Supp. 2d 395",
  104. "230 F. Supp. 587",
  105. "672 F.2d 1064",
  106. "771 F. Supp. 552",
  107. "590 F.2d 422",
  108. "805 F. Supp. 166",
  109. "840 F.2d 143",
  110. "739 F.2d 784",
  111. "80 F.3d 623",
  112. "894 F.2d 501",
  113. "441 F.2d 114",
  114. "620 F.2d 922",
  115. "700 P.2d 549",
  116. "18 Whittier L.Rev. 447",
  117. "24 J. Legal Prof. 261",
  118. "DOJ-OGR-00003900"
  119. ]
  120. },
  121. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a table of authorities from a legal case, with a list of cases and other authorities cited in the document. The text is printed and there are no handwritten notes or stamps visible."
  122. }