mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00004843.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "31",
    "document_number": "310-1",
    "date": "07/02/21",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 310-1 Filed 07/02/21 Page 31 of 80\n\nOn May 24, 2016, following a preliminary hearing, all of Cosby's charges were held for trial. Thereafter, Cosby filed a number of pretrial motions, including a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, a motion to dismiss the charges on due process grounds, and, most pertinent here, a \"Motion to Suppress the Contents of his Deposition Testimony and Any Evidence Derived therefrom on the Basis that the District Attorney's Promise not to Prosecute Him Induced Him to Waive his Fifth Amendment Right Against Self-Incrimination.\" After holding a hearing on the suppression motion, at which no new testimony was taken, the trial court again concluded that former District Attorney Castor's testimony was equivocal, credited the testimony of Constand's attorneys, and found that no promise or agreement not to prosecute existed. Having so determined, the court discerned \"no [c]onstitutional barrier to the use of [Cosby's] civil deposition testimony\" against him at trial, and it denied the suppression motion.15 Later, the Commonwealth would introduce portions of Cosby's deposition testimony against Cosby, including his admissions to using Quaaludes during sexual encounters with women in the past.\n\nOn September 6, 2016, the Commonwealth filed a \"Motion to Introduce Evidence of Other Bad Acts of the Defendant,\" which Cosby opposed by written response. The Commonwealth sought to introduce evidence and testimony from other women who alleged that Cosby had sexually assaulted them, instances that could not be prosecuted due to the lapse of applicable statutes of limitations. On February 24, 2017, the trial court granted the Commonwealth's motion, but permitted only one of these alleged past victims to testify at Cosby's trial.\n\nOn December 30, 2016, Cosby filed a motion seeking a change in venue or venire. The trial court kept the case in Montgomery County, but agreed that the jury should be\n\n15 T.C.O. at 72 (quoting Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order Sur Defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence Pursuant to Pa.R.Crim.P. 581(I), 12/5/2016, at 5).\n\n[J-100-2020] - 30\nDOJ-OGR-00004843",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 310-1 Filed 07/02/21 Page 31 of 80",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "On May 24, 2016, following a preliminary hearing, all of Cosby's charges were held for trial. Thereafter, Cosby filed a number of pretrial motions, including a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, a motion to dismiss the charges on due process grounds, and, most pertinent here, a \"Motion to Suppress the Contents of his Deposition Testimony and Any Evidence Derived therefrom on the Basis that the District Attorney's Promise not to Prosecute Him Induced Him to Waive his Fifth Amendment Right Against Self-Incrimination.\" After holding a hearing on the suppression motion, at which no new testimony was taken, the trial court again concluded that former District Attorney Castor's testimony was equivocal, credited the testimony of Constand's attorneys, and found that no promise or agreement not to prosecute existed. Having so determined, the court discerned \"no [c]onstitutional barrier to the use of [Cosby's] civil deposition testimony\" against him at trial, and it denied the suppression motion.15 Later, the Commonwealth would introduce portions of Cosby's deposition testimony against Cosby, including his admissions to using Quaaludes during sexual encounters with women in the past.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "On September 6, 2016, the Commonwealth filed a \"Motion to Introduce Evidence of Other Bad Acts of the Defendant,\" which Cosby opposed by written response. The Commonwealth sought to introduce evidence and testimony from other women who alleged that Cosby had sexually assaulted them, instances that could not be prosecuted due to the lapse of applicable statutes of limitations. On February 24, 2017, the trial court granted the Commonwealth's motion, but permitted only one of these alleged past victims to testify at Cosby's trial.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "On December 30, 2016, Cosby filed a motion seeking a change in venue or venire. The trial court kept the case in Montgomery County, but agreed that the jury should be",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "15 T.C.O. at 72 (quoting Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order Sur Defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence Pursuant to Pa.R.Crim.P. 581(I), 12/5/2016, at 5).",
      "position": "footnote"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "[J-100-2020] - 30",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00004843",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Cosby",
      "Castor",
      "Constand"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "Commonwealth"
    ],
    "locations": [
      "Montgomery County"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "May 24, 2016",
      "September 6, 2016",
      "February 24, 2017",
      "December 30, 2016",
      "12/5/2016",
      "07/02/21"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "310-1",
      "J-100-2020",
      "DOJ-OGR-00004843"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to the case against Bill Cosby. The text is mostly printed, with a few footnote citations. There are no visible stamps or handwritten annotations."
}