DOJ-OGR-00004896.json 4.1 KB

12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "3",
  4. "document_number": "311-1",
  5. "date": "07/02/21",
  6. "document_type": "court transcript",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 311-1 Filed 07/02/21 Page 3 of 23\n\nxj3q1gra SEALED\n\n(In the robing room)\nTHE COURT: The following proceeding is being conducted ex parte and under seal.\nThe problem is, it's not being conducted in a matter, and that is one of my first questions to Mr. Rossmiller: Why was this not filed on the Court's docket with a miscellaneous number? We don't file things under U.S. Attorney numbers. This should have been brought as a miscellaneous matter.\nMR. ROSSMILLER: So, your Honor, it was originally submitted with Judge Sweet --\nTHE COURT: I understand what he did, but I will tell you that in the opinion that will never issue, because Judge Sweet died, but he had written, and now I'm stuck with this, Judge Sweet questioned why you had not made this an \"In re: The Matter of Application of the Grand Jury\" or something or other, with a proper miscellaneous docket number. The fact that it would have gone to Judge Sweet doesn't mean anything. I have no way to docket USAO No. 2018R01618. That's your reference number, not ours.\nMR. ROSSMILLER: I understand, your Honor. I think we had understood that the submission should be made to the court that had entered the protective order and that --\nTHE COURT: That's true, but that doesn't mean it doesn't get a miscellaneous docket number.\nThe first thing that's going to happen, this is going to\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 SDNY_GM_00000854 DOJ-OGR-00004896",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 311-1 Filed 07/02/21 Page 3 of 23",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "xj3q1gra SEALED",
  20. "position": "header"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "(In the robing room)\nTHE COURT: The following proceeding is being conducted ex parte and under seal.\nThe problem is, it's not being conducted in a matter, and that is one of my first questions to Mr. Rossmiller: Why was this not filed on the Court's docket with a miscellaneous number? We don't file things under U.S. Attorney numbers. This should have been brought as a miscellaneous matter.\nMR. ROSSMILLER: So, your Honor, it was originally submitted with Judge Sweet --\nTHE COURT: I understand what he did, but I will tell you that in the opinion that will never issue, because Judge Sweet died, but he had written, and now I'm stuck with this, Judge Sweet questioned why you had not made this an \"In re: The Matter of Application of the Grand Jury\" or something or other, with a proper miscellaneous docket number. The fact that it would have gone to Judge Sweet doesn't mean anything. I have no way to docket USAO No. 2018R01618. That's your reference number, not ours.\nMR. ROSSMILLER: I understand, your Honor. I think we had understood that the submission should be made to the court that had entered the protective order and that --\nTHE COURT: That's true, but that doesn't mean it doesn't get a miscellaneous docket number.\nThe first thing that's going to happen, this is going to",
  25. "position": "main"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 SDNY_GM_00000854 DOJ-OGR-00004896",
  30. "position": "footer"
  31. }
  32. ],
  33. "entities": {
  34. "people": [
  35. "Mr. Rossmiller",
  36. "Judge Sweet"
  37. ],
  38. "organizations": [
  39. "U.S. Attorney",
  40. "Southern District Reporters, P.C."
  41. ],
  42. "locations": [],
  43. "dates": [
  44. "07/02/21"
  45. ],
  46. "reference_numbers": [
  47. "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
  48. "311-1",
  49. "2018R01618",
  50. "SDNY_GM_00000854",
  51. "DOJ-OGR-00004896"
  52. ]
  53. },
  54. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a header indicating it is sealed. The transcript discusses a proceeding related to a grand jury application and the proper docketing procedure. The footer contains information about the court reporters and reference numbers."
  55. }