mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00004904.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "11",
    "document_number": "311-1",
    "date": "07/02/21",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 311-1 Filed 07/02/21 Page 11 of 23\n\nXj3q1gra SEALED\n10\norder,\" it is David Boies and his partners. I mean, really.\nMR. ROSSMILLER: I'm sure you're right, your Honor, and --\nTHE COURT: They don't need the government's protection.\nMR. ROSSMILLER: Not that I don't begrudge the dozens of hours that I have spent on it in lieu of Boies Schiller, but I think -- and with apologies of perhaps being persnickety myself, but the relief that we are seeking is not precisely to allow Boies Schiller to do something but rather for the modification of the protective order that would then allow that, but we did think that we were able to make the application via the All Writs Act, and I think it was our general understanding from Judge Sweet's response asking us for support for our submission, rather than, for example, denying it based on lack of standing at the outset or simply asking us to have Boies Schiller make the application. I don't know what, if any, difference there would be in terms of the legal analysis from Boies Schiller, but I can say that I think the current posture does allow the government to explain why the investigation is extraordinary in the sense of how other decisions and courts have described it and where we, the government, are better able to explain --\nTHE COURT: But what do you mean by what you just said? I mean, you have an investigation into an allegation of\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 SDNY_GM_00000862 DOJ-OGR-00004904",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 311-1 Filed 07/02/21 Page 11 of 23",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Xj3q1gra SEALED",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "order,\" it is David Boies and his partners. I mean, really.\nMR. ROSSMILLER: I'm sure you're right, your Honor, and --\nTHE COURT: They don't need the government's protection.\nMR. ROSSMILLER: Not that I don't begrudge the dozens of hours that I have spent on it in lieu of Boies Schiller, but I think -- and with apologies of perhaps being persnickety myself, but the relief that we are seeking is not precisely to allow Boies Schiller to do something but rather for the modification of the protective order that would then allow that, but we did think that we were able to make the application via the All Writs Act, and I think it was our general understanding from Judge Sweet's response asking us for support for our submission, rather than, for example, denying it based on lack of standing at the outset or simply asking us to have Boies Schiller make the application. I don't know what, if any, difference there would be in terms of the legal analysis from Boies Schiller, but I can say that I think the current posture does allow the government to explain why the investigation is extraordinary in the sense of how other decisions and courts have described it and where we, the government, are better able to explain --\nTHE COURT: But what do you mean by what you just said? I mean, you have an investigation into an allegation of",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 SDNY_GM_00000862 DOJ-OGR-00004904",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "David Boies",
      "MR. ROSSMILLER",
      "Judge Sweet"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "Boies Schiller",
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "07/02/21"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "311-1",
      "SDNY_GM_00000862",
      "DOJ-OGR-00004904"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a header indicating it is sealed. The content includes a conversation between MR. ROSSMILLER and THE COURT. The footer contains information about the reporter and reference numbers."
}