| 1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253545556575859606162636465 |
- {
- "document_metadata": {
- "page_number": "6",
- "document_number": "384",
- "date": "10/29/21",
- "document_type": "court document",
- "has_handwriting": false,
- "has_stamps": false
- },
- "full_text": "rejected by the Court which ordered disclosure at the same time as the government's witness list, Rule 404(b) notice, exhibits, and 3500 materials no later than October 11, 2021, so that the Defense would not be surprised at trial and because of \"the need for the parties to litigate co-conspirator issues in advance of trial....\" Dkt. 335 at 3. The government seized multiple electronic devices, including computers and servers from alleged co-conspirator Epstein. These devices contain hundreds of thousands of statements spanning decades. The emails on the devices are to and from many other individuals. Many of the emails are cryptic, subject to interpretation, and appear to be outside of the scope of either conspiracy alleged in the S2 Indictment. It is impossible for Ms. Maxwell to identify any statement that she may need to litigate in advance of trial and, even if she wanted to do so, any attempt would be futile because the government could avoid any issue by simply picking some other statement. Absent pre-trial identification of any alleged co-conspirator statement, Ms. Maxwell will be forced to, during trial, object to any proffered statement, request a recess, identify whether the purported statement was actually produced in discovery, and at some point, litigate the admissibility of the statement. Of course, this is precisely what the Court's Order was intended to avoid. Given the amount of discourse over this topic, the government must understand what the Court ordered it to disclose. It has chosen, however, to avoid and violate the Court's Order by attempting to overstuff an already full sandbag by ignoring both the plain language and spirit of the Order mandating disclosure. Instead of simply disclosing the purported statements the government has directed Ms. Maxwell back to the hundreds of thousands of \"statements\" produced or to be produced in the case. 3 DOJ-OGR-00005600",
- "text_blocks": [
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "rejected by the Court which ordered disclosure at the same time as the government's witness list, Rule 404(b) notice, exhibits, and 3500 materials no later than October 11, 2021, so that the Defense would not be surprised at trial and because of \"the need for the parties to litigate co-conspirator issues in advance of trial....\" Dkt. 335 at 3.",
- "position": "top"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "The government seized multiple electronic devices, including computers and servers from alleged co-conspirator Epstein. These devices contain hundreds of thousands of statements spanning decades. The emails on the devices are to and from many other individuals. Many of the emails are cryptic, subject to interpretation, and appear to be outside of the scope of either conspiracy alleged in the S2 Indictment.",
- "position": "middle"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "It is impossible for Ms. Maxwell to identify any statement that she may need to litigate in advance of trial and, even if she wanted to do so, any attempt would be futile because the government could avoid any issue by simply picking some other statement. Absent pre-trial identification of any alleged co-conspirator statement, Ms. Maxwell will be forced to, during trial, object to any proffered statement, request a recess, identify whether the purported statement was actually produced in discovery, and at some point, litigate the admissibility of the statement. Of course, this is precisely what the Court's Order was intended to avoid.",
- "position": "middle"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Given the amount of discourse over this topic, the government must understand what the Court ordered it to disclose. It has chosen, however, to avoid and violate the Court's Order by attempting to overstuff an already full sandbag by ignoring both the plain language and spirit of the Order mandating disclosure. Instead of simply disclosing the purported statements the government has directed Ms. Maxwell back to the hundreds of thousands of \"statements\" produced or to be produced in the case.",
- "position": "bottom"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "3",
- "position": "footer"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "DOJ-OGR-00005600",
- "position": "footer"
- }
- ],
- "entities": {
- "people": [
- "Maxwell",
- "Epstein"
- ],
- "organizations": [
- "Court",
- "DOJ"
- ],
- "locations": [],
- "dates": [
- "October 11, 2021",
- "10/29/21"
- ],
- "reference_numbers": [
- "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
- "Document 384",
- "Dkt. 335",
- "DOJ-OGR-00005600"
- ]
- },
- "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to the case of Ms. Maxwell, with references to a co-conspirator named Epstein and various court documents and dates. The text is printed and there are no visible stamps or handwritten notes."
- }
|