mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES003/DOJ-OGR-00007136.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "85",
    "document_number": "465",
    "date": "11/15/21",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 465 Filed 11/15/21 Page 85 of 127 85 LB1TMAX3\n1 is bought that day, it's direct evidence, if it's bought three\n2 years earlier or three years later, at best it's 404(b)\n3 evidence, not direct evidence.\n4 MS. MOE: Well, here the pattern would be much\n5 stronger, that the defendant participated -- again, to play out\n6 the analogy -- in a robbery in 1994 involving ski masks, and\n7 another robbery in 1995 involving ski masks, and again another\n8 robbery in which the defendant bought ski masks, and then a\n9 robbery years later in which the perpetrator was wearing a very\n10 similar ski mask. That's the pattern here and why this is\n11 direct evidence of the defendant's methods and her knowledge\n12 and intent.\n13 THE COURT: That's 404(b), evidence of methods, of MO.\n14 MS. MOE: Here, your Honor, the government certainly\n15 submits that this would otherwise be admissible under Rule\n16 404(b), but here where the conduct is intertwined with the\n17 conduct on trial, that it speaks to her knowledge about\n18 preferences and the role that she played and the similarity,\n19 and the fact this happened during the course of the charged\n20 conspiracy the same time the defendant was involved in this\n21 conduct with respect to other --\n22 THE COURT: During the time of the Mann Act charged\n23 conspiracy.\n24 MS. MOE: That's correct, your Honor.\n25 THE COURT: Not the trafficking charged conspiracy.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 465 Filed 11/15/21 Page 85 of 127 85 LB1TMAX3",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 is bought that day, it's direct evidence, if it's bought three\n2 years earlier or three years later, at best it's 404(b)\n3 evidence, not direct evidence.\n4 MS. MOE: Well, here the pattern would be much\n5 stronger, that the defendant participated -- again, to play out\n6 the analogy -- in a robbery in 1994 involving ski masks, and\n7 another robbery in 1995 involving ski masks, and again another\n8 robbery in which the defendant bought ski masks, and then a\n9 robbery years later in which the perpetrator was wearing a very\n10 similar ski mask. That's the pattern here and why this is\n11 direct evidence of the defendant's methods and her knowledge\n12 and intent.\n13 THE COURT: That's 404(b), evidence of methods, of MO.\n14 MS. MOE: Here, your Honor, the government certainly\n15 submits that this would otherwise be admissible under Rule\n16 404(b), but here where the conduct is intertwined with the\n17 conduct on trial, that it speaks to her knowledge about\n18 preferences and the role that she played and the similarity,\n19 and the fact this happened during the course of the charged\n20 conspiracy the same time the defendant was involved in this\n21 conduct with respect to other --\n22 THE COURT: During the time of the Mann Act charged\n23 conspiracy.\n24 MS. MOE: That's correct, your Honor.\n25 THE COURT: Not the trafficking charged conspiracy.",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MS. MOE"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "11/15/21",
      "1994",
      "1995"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "Document 465",
      "Page 85 of 127"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a discussion about the admissibility of evidence under Rule 404(b). The conversation is between MS. MOE and THE COURT."
}