DOJ-OGR-00008014.json 3.8 KB

12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "146",
  4. "document_number": "499-2",
  5. "date": "11/23/21",
  6. "document_type": "court transcript",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 499-2 Filed 11/23/21 Page 146 of 159\nLBAAMAX5ps Rocchio - Cross\n1 Honor, part of my point.\n2 THE COURT: If the point is that she doesn't know any\n3 of the facts of the specific case and the government concedes\n4 that's true, we can move on.\n5 MR. PAGLIUCA: Yes.\n6 I guess the other point, your Honor, which I can\n7 develop, is, these studies that are included and impact the\n8 statistics are really not relevant here because they deal with\n9 males or a combination of males and females, and there are only\n10 a few of them that deal with females specifically.\n11 THE COURT: OK.\n12 MR. PAGLIUCA: So when we're conflating these things,\n13 it conflates the numbers.\n14 May I proceed, your Honor?\n15 THE COURT: You may.\n16 MR. PAGLIUCA: Thank you.\n17 Q. So that the first study, which is in 2016, in the last\n18 column, is all males. Do you see that?\n19 A. Could you -- the page is upside down on my screen. Can we\n20 rotate it so that I can look at what you're seeing, please.\n21 MR. PAGLIUCA: I don't know if Ms. Drescher can do\n22 that or not.\n23 THE WITNESS: Or I can look at a paper copy. But I --\n24 there's no way I can read that.\n25 THE COURT: I can't read it either.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00008014",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 499-2 Filed 11/23/21 Page 146 of 159",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "LBAAMAX5ps Rocchio - Cross",
  20. "position": "header"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "1 Honor, part of my point.\n2 THE COURT: If the point is that she doesn't know any\n3 of the facts of the specific case and the government concedes\n4 that's true, we can move on.\n5 MR. PAGLIUCA: Yes.\n6 I guess the other point, your Honor, which I can\n7 develop, is, these studies that are included and impact the\n8 statistics are really not relevant here because they deal with\n9 males or a combination of males and females, and there are only\n10 a few of them that deal with females specifically.\n11 THE COURT: OK.\n12 MR. PAGLIUCA: So when we're conflating these things,\n13 it conflates the numbers.\n14 May I proceed, your Honor?\n15 THE COURT: You may.\n16 MR. PAGLIUCA: Thank you.\n17 Q. So that the first study, which is in 2016, in the last\n18 column, is all males. Do you see that?\n19 A. Could you -- the page is upside down on my screen. Can we\n20 rotate it so that I can look at what you're seeing, please.\n21 MR. PAGLIUCA: I don't know if Ms. Drescher can do\n22 that or not.\n23 THE WITNESS: Or I can look at a paper copy. But I --\n24 there's no way I can read that.\n25 THE COURT: I can't read it either.",
  25. "position": "main"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
  30. "position": "footer"
  31. },
  32. {
  33. "type": "printed",
  34. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00008014",
  35. "position": "footer"
  36. }
  37. ],
  38. "entities": {
  39. "people": [
  40. "PAGLIUCA",
  41. "Drescher"
  42. ],
  43. "organizations": [
  44. "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
  45. ],
  46. "locations": [],
  47. "dates": [
  48. "11/23/21",
  49. "2016"
  50. ],
  51. "reference_numbers": [
  52. "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
  53. "499-2",
  54. "DOJ-OGR-00008014"
  55. ]
  56. },
  57. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a discussion between the court and lawyers about the relevance of certain studies. The page contains a mix of dialogue and some technical issues with reading a document on screen."
  58. }