mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00008972.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "1 of 3",
    "document_number": "605",
    "date": "02/18/22",
    "document_type": "Court Order",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": true
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 605 Filed 02/18/22 Page 1 of 3\nUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK\nUnited States of America,\n-v-\nGhislain Maxwell,\nDefendant.\n20-CR-330 (AJN)\nORDER\nALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge:\nThe Court is in receipt of the parties' proposed redactions to the Defendant's motion for a new trial, the Government's response in opposition, and the Defendant's reply in support. See Dkt. No. 596. The parties did not propose any redactions to Juror 50's motion nor the parties letters dated January 13, 2022. See id. at 7. The Defendant submitted a letter justifying her proposed redactions, Dkt. No. 602, and the Government submitted an opposition to the proposals, Dkt. No. 603.\nThe Court determines that the following proposed redactions are not consistent with the Court's prior order, Dkt. No. 596, because they redact information that is widely reported in the press and/or redact legal arguments:\n- Defense Br. at:\n  - ii, lines 17-18;\n  - 21, lines 1-2;\n  - 49, lines 16-21;\n  - 51, lines 10-16;\n  - 57, lines 5-7\n- Gov. Resp. at:\n1\nDOJ-OGR-00008972",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 605 Filed 02/18/22 Page 1 of 3",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "United States of America,\n-v-\nGhislain Maxwell,\nDefendant.",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "20-CR-330 (AJN)\nORDER",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge:",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "The Court is in receipt of the parties' proposed redactions to the Defendant's motion for a new trial, the Government's response in opposition, and the Defendant's reply in support. See Dkt. No. 596. The parties did not propose any redactions to Juror 50's motion nor the parties letters dated January 13, 2022. See id. at 7. The Defendant submitted a letter justifying her proposed redactions, Dkt. No. 602, and the Government submitted an opposition to the proposals, Dkt. No. 603.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "The Court determines that the following proposed redactions are not consistent with the Court's prior order, Dkt. No. 596, because they redact information that is widely reported in the press and/or redact legal arguments:",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "- Defense Br. at:\n  - ii, lines 17-18;\n  - 21, lines 1-2;\n  - 49, lines 16-21;\n  - 51, lines 10-16;\n  - 57, lines 5-7\n- Gov. Resp. at:",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "stamp",
      "content": "USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC#: DATE FILED: 2/18/22",
      "position": "margin"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1\nDOJ-OGR-00008972",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ghislain Maxwell",
      "Alison J. Nathan"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "United States District Court",
      "United States of America"
    ],
    "locations": [
      "New York"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "02/18/22",
      "January 13, 2022"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "Document 605",
      "20-CR-330 (AJN)",
      "Dkt. No. 596",
      "Dkt. No. 602",
      "Dkt. No. 603",
      "DOJ-OGR-00008972"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court order with some redactions. The stamp in the top-right corner indicates that it was electronically filed."
}