mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00008975.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "1",
    "document_number": "606",
    "date": "02/21/22",
    "document_type": "Letter",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 606 Filed 02/21/22 Page 1 of 1\nLAW OFFICES OF BOBBI C. STERNHEIM\n212-243-1100 • Main\n917-912-9698 • Cell\n888-587-4737 • Fax\n225 Broadway, Suite 715\nNew York, NY 10007\nbcsternheim@mac.com\nFebruary 21, 2022\nHonorable Alison J. Nathan\nUnited States District Judge\nUnited States Courthouse\n40 Foley Square\nNew York, NY 10007\nRe: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell\nS2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)\nDear Judge Nathan:\nThe annexed documents, previously submitted under seal, contain proposed redactions in conformance with the Court's Orders (Dkt. 596, 605).1\nThe proposed redactions are intended to ensure the integrity of the fact-finding process to uncover the truth surrounding Juror 50's conduct during the voir dire process, to ensure juror anonymity and privacy, and to preserve specific factual information developed by the defense that has not been publicly reported and that the defense proposes to inquire about at any forthcoming hearing.\nIn an abundance of caution, we have proposed redactions to information and data about the responses of other jurors (selected and prospective) to the jury questionnaire because the questionnaires and sealed portions of the voir dire transcript are not part of the public record. The public disclosure of juror information, even if provided anonymously, risks compromising the integrity of the jury selection process and the willingness of potential jurors to disclose personal information.\nVery truly yours,\n/s/\nBOBBI C. STERNHEIM\nAttachments\ncc: Counsel of Record\n1 The documents - Ghislaine Maxwell's Motion for a New Trial, the Government's Opposition, and Ms. Maxwell's Reply - will remain under seal pending the Court's decision regarding the proposed redactions.\nDOJ-OGR-00008975",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 606 Filed 02/21/22 Page 1 of 1",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "LAW OFFICES OF BOBBI C. STERNHEIM",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "212-243-1100 • Main\n917-912-9698 • Cell\n888-587-4737 • Fax\n225 Broadway, Suite 715\nNew York, NY 10007\nbcsternheim@mac.com",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "February 21, 2022",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Honorable Alison J. Nathan\nUnited States District Judge\nUnited States Courthouse\n40 Foley Square\nNew York, NY 10007",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell\nS2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Dear Judge Nathan:",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "The annexed documents, previously submitted under seal, contain proposed redactions in conformance with the Court's Orders (Dkt. 596, 605).1",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "The proposed redactions are intended to ensure the integrity of the fact-finding process to uncover the truth surrounding Juror 50's conduct during the voir dire process, to ensure juror anonymity and privacy, and to preserve specific factual information developed by the defense that has not been publicly reported and that the defense proposes to inquire about at any forthcoming hearing.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "In an abundance of caution, we have proposed redactions to information and data about the responses of other jurors (selected and prospective) to the jury questionnaire because the questionnaires and sealed portions of the voir dire transcript are not part of the public record. The public disclosure of juror information, even if provided anonymously, risks compromising the integrity of the jury selection process and the willingness of potential jurors to disclose personal information.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Very truly yours,",
      "position": "bottom"
    },
    {
      "type": "signature",
      "content": "/s/\nBOBBI C. STERNHEIM",
      "position": "bottom"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Attachments\ncc: Counsel of Record",
      "position": "bottom"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 The documents - Ghislaine Maxwell's Motion for a New Trial, the Government's Opposition, and Ms. Maxwell's Reply - will remain under seal pending the Court's decision regarding the proposed redactions.",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00008975",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Alison J. Nathan",
      "Ghislaine Maxwell",
      "Bobbi C. Sternheim"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim",
      "United States Courthouse"
    ],
    "locations": [
      "New York"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "February 21, 2022",
      "02/21/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "Document 606",
      "Dkt. 596",
      "605",
      "S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)",
      "DOJ-OGR-00008975"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a formal letter from Bobbi C. Sternheim to Honorable Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter discusses proposed redactions to documents related to the case."
}