| 1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253545556575859 |
- {
- "document_metadata": {
- "page_number": "2",
- "document_number": "613",
- "date": "02/24/22",
- "document_type": "Table of Contents",
- "has_handwriting": false,
- "has_stamps": false
- },
- "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 613 Filed 02/24/22 Page 2 of 66\n\nTable of Contents\n\nTable of Contents.......................................................................................................................ii\nTable of Authorities....................................................................................................................iv\nIntroduction ...............................................................................................................................1\nFactual Background....................................................................................................................2\nI. Jury Selection........................................................................................................................2\nA. The jury questionnaire....................................................................................................2\nB. Juror No. 50's questionnaire...........................................................................................5\nC. Juror No. 50's voir dire...................................................................................................6\nD. The final composition of the jury....................................................................................9\nII. Juror No. 50's admissions that he wasn't truthful with the Court..........................................11\nA. Juror No. 50's statements to the media..........................................................................12\n1. The interview with the Independent.........................................................................12\n2. The interview with the Daily Mail............................................................................13\n3. The interview with Reuters......................................................................................14\n4. The partial video of the interview with the Daily Mail.............................................14\nB. Juror No. 50's social media activity...............................................................................15\nC. A second juror admits to disclosing during deliberations that they were a victim of sexual assault...........................................................................................................................21\nApplicable Law.........................................................................................................................21\nI. Juror No. 50's misconduct deprived Ms. Maxwell of her constitutional right to a fair trial by an impartial jury................................................................................................................21\nA. A party alleging unfairness based on undisclosed juror bias must demonstrate first, that the juror's voir dire response was false and second, that the correct response would have provided a valid basis for a challenge for cause....................................................................21\nii\nDOJ-OGR-00009003",
- "text_blocks": [
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 613 Filed 02/24/22 Page 2 of 66",
- "position": "header"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Table of Contents",
- "position": "top"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Table of Contents.......................................................................................................................ii\nTable of Authorities....................................................................................................................iv\nIntroduction ...............................................................................................................................1\nFactual Background....................................................................................................................2\nI. Jury Selection........................................................................................................................2\nA. The jury questionnaire....................................................................................................2\nB. Juror No. 50's questionnaire...........................................................................................5\nC. Juror No. 50's voir dire...................................................................................................6\nD. The final composition of the jury....................................................................................9\nII. Juror No. 50's admissions that he wasn't truthful with the Court..........................................11\nA. Juror No. 50's statements to the media..........................................................................12\n1. The interview with the Independent.........................................................................12\n2. The interview with the Daily Mail............................................................................13\n3. The interview with Reuters......................................................................................14\n4. The partial video of the interview with the Daily Mail.............................................14\nB. Juror No. 50's social media activity...............................................................................15\nC. A second juror admits to disclosing during deliberations that they were a victim of sexual assault...........................................................................................................................21\nApplicable Law.........................................................................................................................21\nI. Juror No. 50's misconduct deprived Ms. Maxwell of her constitutional right to a fair trial by an impartial jury................................................................................................................21\nA. A party alleging unfairness based on undisclosed juror bias must demonstrate first, that the juror's voir dire response was false and second, that the correct response would have provided a valid basis for a challenge for cause....................................................................21",
- "position": "middle"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "ii",
- "position": "footer"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "DOJ-OGR-00009003",
- "position": "footer"
- }
- ],
- "entities": {
- "people": [
- "Ms. Maxwell"
- ],
- "organizations": [
- "Independent",
- "Daily Mail",
- "Reuters",
- "DOJ"
- ],
- "locations": [],
- "dates": [
- "02/24/22"
- ],
- "reference_numbers": [
- "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
- "613",
- "DOJ-OGR-00009003"
- ]
- },
- "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a table of contents for a legal filing. The text is clear and legible, with no visible redactions or damage."
- }
|