mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00009372.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "83",
    "document_number": "A-5768",
    "date": "08/24/22",
    "document_type": "Court Document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00336-PAE Document 616 Filed 08/24/22 Page 83 of 130 A-5768\n311\nC2grdau2        Brune - cross\n1   A. No.\n2   Q. I ask you the same question. Why not?\n3   A. We spent a lot of time thinking about appellate issues, but\n4   we didn't think that there had been juror misconduct and\n5   therefore didn't think that there was an appellate issue.\n6   Q. At any time between the verdict on May 24th and the receipt\n7   of the letter on June 20th, did your firm contact the Nardello\n8   firm to do additional investigation about Ms. Conrad?\n9   A. No.\n10  Q. Why not?\n11  A. I didn't think there was anything to investigate.\n12  Q. At any time during these proceedings, \"these proceedings\"\n13  meaning between the initial voir dire and today, have you tried\n14  to sandbag this Court or plant error in the record as to Juror\n15  No. 1, Ms. Conrad?\n16  A. No.\n17      MR. SHECHTMAN: No further questions, Judge.\n18      THE COURT: Redirect, Ms. Davis?\n19      MR. DAVIS: I assume there is no other defense counsel\n20  who wishes to inquire?\n21      THE COURT: Does any defense counsel wish to inquire?\n22      MR. GAIR: No, thank you, your Honor.\n23      MR. ROTERT: No, thank you, Judge.\n24      MS. McCARTHY: No, your Honor.\n25      MR. DAVIS: Just briefly, your Honor.\n      MR. DAVIS\n      SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n      (212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00009372",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00336-PAE Document 616 Filed 08/24/22 Page 83 of 130 A-5768",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "311\nC2grdau2        Brune - cross",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1   A. No.\n2   Q. I ask you the same question. Why not?\n3   A. We spent a lot of time thinking about appellate issues, but\n4   we didn't think that there had been juror misconduct and\n5   therefore didn't think that there was an appellate issue.\n6   Q. At any time between the verdict on May 24th and the receipt\n7   of the letter on June 20th, did your firm contact the Nardello\n8   firm to do additional investigation about Ms. Conrad?\n9   A. No.\n10  Q. Why not?\n11  A. I didn't think there was anything to investigate.\n12  Q. At any time during these proceedings, \"these proceedings\"\n13  meaning between the initial voir dire and today, have you tried\n14  to sandbag this Court or plant error in the record as to Juror\n15  No. 1, Ms. Conrad?\n16  A. No.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "17      MR. SHECHTMAN: No further questions, Judge.\n18      THE COURT: Redirect, Ms. Davis?\n19      MR. DAVIS: I assume there is no other defense counsel\n20  who wishes to inquire?\n21      THE COURT: Does any defense counsel wish to inquire?\n22      MR. GAIR: No, thank you, your Honor.\n23      MR. ROTERT: No, thank you, Judge.\n24      MS. McCARTHY: No, your Honor.\n25      MR. DAVIS: Just briefly, your Honor.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "MR. DAVIS\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00009372",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ms. Conrad",
      "Ms. Davis",
      "MR. SHECHTMAN",
      "MR. GAIR",
      "MR. ROTERT",
      "MS. McCARTHY",
      "MR. DAVIS"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.",
      "Nardello firm"
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "May 24th",
      "June 20th",
      "08/24/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00336-PAE",
      "Document 616",
      "A-5768",
      "DOJ-OGR-00009372"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}