mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00009387.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "98",
    "document_number": "1:20-cr-00338",
    "date": "02/24/22",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00338-PAE Document 1616620 Filed 02/24/22 Page 98 of 130 A-5783\n\nC2GFDAU3 Edelstein 326\n1 mentioned there was a suspended lawyer with the name of\n2 Catherine Conrad. The connection that I think she was drawing\n3 was that we had received a note from Juror No. 1 that raised\n4 certain legal concepts, and that was the connection. I did not\n5 ask what the basis was for knowing that there was a suspended\n6 lawyer named Catherine Conrad, no, I did not.\n7 Q. Wasn't that a highly significant fact to find out that\n8 there was a suspended New York attorney with the same name as\n9 Juror No. 1?\n10 A. Actually, my reaction was it was, I thought it was\n11 impossible that they would be the same person based on Juror\n12 No. 1's voir dire responses.\n13 Q. It is correct, is it not, that if you have two people with\n14 similar names that you can do simple, take simple steps to try\n15 to increase or decrease the possibility that the two people\n16 were the same one. Would you agree with me?\n17 A. Hypothetical, if that's what you were doing in a different\n18 situation. We were discussing the fact that there was a\n19 suspended lawyer with the name of Catherine Conrad. We then\n20 were discussing that Juror No. 1 on voir dire in response to\n21 the unambiguous question what is your highest level of\n22 education said that she had a BA in English. To me that ruled\n23 out the possibility that they were the same person.\n24 Q. Ms. Edelstein, could you just answer my question that I\n25 asked? Are there steps that you can take if you have one\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nDOJ-OGR-00009387",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00338-PAE Document 1616620 Filed 02/24/22 Page 98 of 130 A-5783",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "C2GFDAU3 Edelstein 326",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 mentioned there was a suspended lawyer with the name of\n2 Catherine Conrad. The connection that I think she was drawing\n3 was that we had received a note from Juror No. 1 that raised\n4 certain legal concepts, and that was the connection. I did not\n5 ask what the basis was for knowing that there was a suspended\n6 lawyer named Catherine Conrad, no, I did not.\n7 Q. Wasn't that a highly significant fact to find out that\n8 there was a suspended New York attorney with the same name as\n9 Juror No. 1?\n10 A. Actually, my reaction was it was, I thought it was\n11 impossible that they would be the same person based on Juror\n12 No. 1's voir dire responses.\n13 Q. It is correct, is it not, that if you have two people with\n14 similar names that you can do simple, take simple steps to try\n15 to increase or decrease the possibility that the two people\n16 were the same one. Would you agree with me?\n17 A. Hypothetical, if that's what you were doing in a different\n18 situation. We were discussing the fact that there was a\n19 suspended lawyer with the name of Catherine Conrad. We then\n20 were discussing that Juror No. 1 on voir dire in response to\n21 the unambiguous question what is your highest level of\n22 education said that she had a BA in English. To me that ruled\n23 out the possibility that they were the same person.\n24 Q. Ms. Edelstein, could you just answer my question that I\n25 asked? Are there steps that you can take if you have one",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00009387",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Catherine Conrad",
      "Edelstein",
      "Juror No. 1"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [
      "New York"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "02/24/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00338",
      "A-5783",
      "DOJ-OGR-00009387"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}