mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00009391.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "102",
    "document_number": "1:20-cv-03339",
    "date": "02/24/22",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cv-03339 Document 616-2 Filed 02/24/22 Page 102 of 130\nA-5787\nC2GFDAU3 Edelstein 330\n1 had subsequently looked at a Westlaw report that led her to\n2 send an e-mail to somebody else in your firm saying, \"Jesus, I\n3 think this is the one,\" meaning Juror No. 1 was the Catherine\n4 M. Conrad the suspended attorney? Did she tell that you?\n5 A. No.\n6 Q. Did you learn of the Westlaw report during the conversation\n7 with her?\n8 A. No.\n9 Q. At what point did you learn about the Westlaw report\n10 conversation?\n11 A. I learned about the Westlaw report --\n12 Q. I'm sorry the report?\n13 A. After we received the letter and jury verdict.\n14 Q. Before the July --\n15 A. By the letter I mean the letter that was written in May and\n16 received on June 20.\n17 Q. Did you review the Westlaw report before Theresa Trzaskoma\n18 participated in the court conference on July 15?\n19 A. Yes.\n20 Q. Did you yourself notice the similarities between the\n21 address for Catherine M. Conrad, Juror No. 1, the existence of\n22 a personal injury report, same name for her father? Did you\n23 note those things?\n24 A. When --\n25 Q. Did you note those things?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00009391",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cv-03339 Document 616-2 Filed 02/24/22 Page 102 of 130",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "handwritten",
      "content": "A-5787",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "C2GFDAU3 Edelstein 330",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 had subsequently looked at a Westlaw report that led her to\n2 send an e-mail to somebody else in your firm saying, \"Jesus, I\n3 think this is the one,\" meaning Juror No. 1 was the Catherine\n4 M. Conrad the suspended attorney? Did she tell that you?\n5 A. No.\n6 Q. Did you learn of the Westlaw report during the conversation\n7 with her?\n8 A. No.\n9 Q. At what point did you learn about the Westlaw report\n10 conversation?\n11 A. I learned about the Westlaw report --\n12 Q. I'm sorry the report?\n13 A. After we received the letter and jury verdict.\n14 Q. Before the July --\n15 A. By the letter I mean the letter that was written in May and\n16 received on June 20.\n17 Q. Did you review the Westlaw report before Theresa Trzaskoma\n18 participated in the court conference on July 15?\n19 A. Yes.\n20 Q. Did you yourself notice the similarities between the\n21 address for Catherine M. Conrad, Juror No. 1, the existence of\n22 a personal injury report, same name for her father? Did you\n23 note those things?\n24 A. When --\n25 Q. Did you note those things?",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "bottom"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00009391",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Catherine M. Conrad",
      "Theresa Trzaskoma",
      "Edelstein"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "May",
      "June 20",
      "July 15",
      "02/24/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cv-03339",
      "C2GFDAU3",
      "A-5787",
      "DOJ-OGR-00009391"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and readable format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}