mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00009395.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "108",
    "document_number": "A-5791",
    "date": "02/24/22",
    "document_type": "Court Document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330 Document 612-20 Filed 02/24/22 Page 108 of 130\nA-5791\nC2GFDAU3 Edelstein 334\n1 A. I don't believe the suspension report has a Bronxville\n2 address. If you're referring to the Appellate Division.\n3 Q. Did you look at the Westlaw report?\n4 A. Yes.\n5 Q. And did you notice the Bronxville address in the Westlaw\n6 report?\n7 A. There was a Bronxville address listed somewhere in the\n8 Westlaw report.\n9 Q. And did you note a reference to someone that had been\n10 identified by your firm previously as having the same name as\n11 the father of Catherine Conrad, immigration judge?\n12 A. I'm not sure what you're referring to as someone having\n13 been identified earlier. There was, I think there was a\n14 mention -- well, I don't know that in the report there's a\n15 mention of any father. I think that there's talks about head\n16 of household of a house that was owned and it lists two people.\n17 I didn't know who Catherine Conrad's father was.\n18 Q. That was Robert Conrad, is that correct, the one you saw\n19 was head of household?\n20 A. That's correct.\n21 Q. And when you saw the e-mail traffic at some point, did you\n22 see there was a reference by people in your firm who had\n23 referred to Robert Conrad in the e-mail traffic?\n24 A. Later on when I saw the e-mail exchange.\n25 Q. And those e-mail exchanges existed during the course of the\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00009395",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330 Document 612-20 Filed 02/24/22 Page 108 of 130",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "A-5791",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "C2GFDAU3 Edelstein 334",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 A. I don't believe the suspension report has a Bronxville\n2 address. If you're referring to the Appellate Division.\n3 Q. Did you look at the Westlaw report?\n4 A. Yes.\n5 Q. And did you notice the Bronxville address in the Westlaw\n6 report?\n7 A. There was a Bronxville address listed somewhere in the\n8 Westlaw report.\n9 Q. And did you note a reference to someone that had been\n10 identified by your firm previously as having the same name as\n11 the father of Catherine Conrad, immigration judge?\n12 A. I'm not sure what you're referring to as someone having\n13 been identified earlier. There was, I think there was a\n14 mention -- well, I don't know that in the report there's a\n15 mention of any father. I think that there's talks about head\n16 of household of a house that was owned and it lists two people.\n17 I didn't know who Catherine Conrad's father was.\n18 Q. That was Robert Conrad, is that correct, the one you saw\n19 was head of household?\n20 A. That's correct.\n21 Q. And when you saw the e-mail traffic at some point, did you\n22 see there was a reference by people in your firm who had\n23 referred to Robert Conrad in the e-mail traffic?\n24 A. Later on when I saw the e-mail exchange.\n25 Q. And those e-mail exchanges existed during the course of the",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00009395",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Catherine Conrad",
      "Robert Conrad"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [
      "Bronxville",
      "Appellate Division"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "02/24/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330",
      "A-5791",
      "DOJ-OGR-00009395"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}