mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00009423.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "43",
    "document_number": "1:20-cv-03038-PAE",
    "date": "02/24/22",
    "document_type": "Court Transcript",
    "has_handwriting": true,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cv-03038-PAE Document 616-1 Filed 02/24/22 Page 43 of 117 A-5819\n362\nC2grdau4 Schoeman - direct\n1 Q. Did you take any action based on that conversation?\n2 A. No.\n3 Q. We know that it was after the juror's note. Do you recall when it was?\n4 A. I can't say exactly when it was. I believe it was during\n5 the deliberations either that Friday or sometime the following\n6 week.\n7\n8 MR. SHECHTMAN: No further questions.\n9 THE COURT: Cross-examination?\n10 MR. OKULA: Briefly, your Honor.\n11 CROSS-EXAMINATION\n12 BY MR. OKULA:\n13 Q. Good afternoon, Mr. Schoeman. How are you?\n14 A. Good, thank you. Good afternoon.\n15 Q. Dr. DeRosa sends his regards?\n16 A. I send mine right back.\n17 Q. You said you had this conversation with Ms. Trzaskoma after\n18 the note was received in court, is that correct?\n19 A. Yes.\n20 Q. Was it the same day or the following day?\n21 A. I don't believe it was either the same day or the following\n22 day. I believe it was sometime a couple of days or several\n23 days later.\n24 Q. You talked about the follow-up questions that you asked to\n25 try to get to the bottom of the information, is that correct?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00009423",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cv-03038-PAE Document 616-1 Filed 02/24/22 Page 43 of 117",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "handwritten",
      "content": "A-5819",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "362\nC2grdau4 Schoeman - direct\n1 Q. Did you take any action based on that conversation?\n2 A. No.\n3 Q. We know that it was after the juror's note. Do you recall when it was?\n4 A. I can't say exactly when it was. I believe it was during\n5 the deliberations either that Friday or sometime the following\n6 week.\n7\n8 MR. SHECHTMAN: No further questions.\n9 THE COURT: Cross-examination?\n10 MR. OKULA: Briefly, your Honor.\n11 CROSS-EXAMINATION\n12 BY MR. OKULA:\n13 Q. Good afternoon, Mr. Schoeman. How are you?\n14 A. Good, thank you. Good afternoon.\n15 Q. Dr. DeRosa sends his regards?\n16 A. I send mine right back.\n17 Q. You said you had this conversation with Ms. Trzaskoma after\n18 the note was received in court, is that correct?\n19 A. Yes.\n20 Q. Was it the same day or the following day?\n21 A. I don't believe it was either the same day or the following\n22 day. I believe it was sometime a couple of days or several\n23 days later.\n24 Q. You talked about the follow-up questions that you asked to\n25 try to get to the bottom of the information, is that correct?",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00009423",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Schoeman",
      "Mr. Shechtman",
      "Mr. Okula",
      "Dr. DeRosa",
      "Ms. Trzaskoma"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "02/24/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cv-03038-PAE",
      "616-1",
      "DOJ-OGR-00009423"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with some handwritten annotations. The text is mostly clear, but there may be some minor issues with OCR accuracy due to the quality of the scan."
}