| 1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253545556575859606162636465666768697071727374 |
- {
- "document_metadata": {
- "page_number": "83",
- "document_number": "A-5823",
- "date": "02/24/22",
- "document_type": "Court Transcript",
- "has_handwriting": false,
- "has_stamps": false
- },
- "full_text": "Case 1:20-cv-03038-PAE Document 616-1 Filed 02/24/22 Page 83 of 117\nA-5823\nC2rdaU4 Schoeman - cross 366\n1 THE COURT: Mr. Shechtman.\n2 REDIRECT EXAMINATION\n3 BY MR. SHECHTMAN:\n4 Q. Mr. Schoeman, just to be clear, on May 13th or sometime thereafter Ms. Trzaskoma told you that she had rejected the conclusion that Juror No. 1 was a suspended attorney, is that correct?\n8 A. Yes.\n9 MR. SHECHTMAN: Very good.\n10 MR. OKULA: Nothing else, your Honor.\n11 THE COURT: Mr. Schoeman, did you get any understanding from Ms. Trzaskoma as to why it was that she was sharing this information or her deliberative process with you?\n14 THE WITNESS: I didn't have an understanding. We, having spent many months of trial together, often shared information. It was consistent with our pattern of sharing information during the course of the trial. But I have described I think the entirety of the conversation.\n19 THE COURT: Anything further?\n20 MR. OKULA: Nothing. Thank you, your Honor.\n21 THE COURT: You're excused. You may step down. (Witness excused)\n23 MR. SHECHTMAN: Mr. Parse calls Barry Berke of the same law firm.\n24 BARRY H. BERKE,\n25 SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00009427",
- "text_blocks": [
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Case 1:20-cv-03038-PAE Document 616-1 Filed 02/24/22 Page 83 of 117",
- "position": "header"
- },
- {
- "type": "handwritten",
- "content": "A-5823",
- "position": "header"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "C2rdaU4 Schoeman - cross 366",
- "position": "header"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "1 THE COURT: Mr. Shechtman.\n2 REDIRECT EXAMINATION\n3 BY MR. SHECHTMAN:\n4 Q. Mr. Schoeman, just to be clear, on May 13th or sometime thereafter Ms. Trzaskoma told you that she had rejected the conclusion that Juror No. 1 was a suspended attorney, is that correct?\n8 A. Yes.\n9 MR. SHECHTMAN: Very good.\n10 MR. OKULA: Nothing else, your Honor.\n11 THE COURT: Mr. Schoeman, did you get any understanding from Ms. Trzaskoma as to why it was that she was sharing this information or her deliberative process with you?\n14 THE WITNESS: I didn't have an understanding. We, having spent many months of trial together, often shared information. It was consistent with our pattern of sharing information during the course of the trial. But I have described I think the entirety of the conversation.\n19 THE COURT: Anything further?\n20 MR. OKULA: Nothing. Thank you, your Honor.\n21 THE COURT: You're excused. You may step down. (Witness excused)",
- "position": "main"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "23 MR. SHECHTMAN: Mr. Parse calls Barry Berke of the same law firm.",
- "position": "main"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "BARRY H. BERKE,\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
- "position": "footer"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "DOJ-OGR-00009427",
- "position": "footer"
- }
- ],
- "entities": {
- "people": [
- "Mr. Shechtman",
- "Mr. Schoeman",
- "Ms. Trzaskoma",
- "Mr. Okula",
- "Mr. Parse",
- "Barry Berke",
- "Barry H. Berke"
- ],
- "organizations": [
- "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
- ],
- "locations": [],
- "dates": [
- "May 13th",
- "02/24/22"
- ],
- "reference_numbers": [
- "1:20-cv-03038-PAE",
- "616-1",
- "A-5823",
- "DOJ-OGR-00009427"
- ]
- },
- "additional_notes": "The document is a court transcript with a clear structure. The text is mostly printed, with one handwritten annotation 'A-5823' at the top. The document contains a redirect examination of Mr. Schoeman by Mr. Shechtman. The transcript includes the names of individuals involved in the trial and the court reporter information at the bottom."
- }
|