mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00009473.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "27",
    "document_number": "522",
    "date": "04/06/12",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:09-cr-00581-WHP Document 522 Filed 04/06/12 Page 27 of 29\nStephen Gillers\n105. \"Some Misrepresentations Among Corporate Lawyers,\" New York Professional Responsibility Report, June 2000 at 1.\n106. \"Was Hubbell Case About Getting Justice or Getting Even?\" Los Angeles Times, June 18, 2000 at M2 (comment on the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in United States v. Hubbell, decided June 5, 2000).\n107. \"Who Owns the Privilege After a Merger?\" New York Professional Responsibility Report, July 2000 at 1.\n108. \"Fighting the Future,\" The American Lawyer, July 2000 at 55.\n109. \"Campus Visits Deconstructed,\" Newsweek: How To Get Into College, 2001 Edition at 46.\n110. \"The Court Should Boldly Take Charge,\" New York Times, Tuesday, November 21, 2000 at A25 (Florida's presidential election recount).\n111. \"Who Says the Election Has a Dec. 12 Deadline?\" New York Times, Saturday, December 2, 2000 at A19.\n112. \"Motive Is Everything in the Marc Rich Pardon,\" New York Times, Saturday, February 17, 2001.\n113. \"For Justice To Be Blind, Must Judges Be Mute?\" New York Times, Sunday, March 4, 2001 at Section 4, page 3.\n114. \"Should Supreme Court Justices Have Life Tenure?\" Reprinted in The Supreme Court and Its Justices (Choper J., ed.) (ABA 2001).\n115. Professionalism Symposium, 52 South Carolina L. Rev. 55 (2001) (closing remarks).\n116. \"No Lawyers To Call,\" New York Times, Monday, December 3, 2001 at A19 (ethical and constitutional obligations that will prevent lawyers from participating in military tribunals).\n117. \"Let Judicial Candidates Speak,\" New York Times, Thursday, March 28, 2002 at A31.\n118. \"The Flaw in the Andersen Verdict,\" New York Times, Tuesday, June 18, 2002 at A23.\n119. \"Why Judges Should Make Court Documents Public,\" New York Times, Saturday, November 30, 2002 at A17.\n120. \"It's an MJP World,\" ABA Journal, December 2002 at 51.\n121. \"Upholding the Law as Pretrial Publicity Goes Global,\" New York Times, Sunday, April 27, 2003, Sec. 4 at 14.\n17\nDOJ-OGR-00009473",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:09-cr-00581-WHP Document 522 Filed 04/06/12 Page 27 of 29",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Stephen Gillers",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "105. \"Some Misrepresentations Among Corporate Lawyers,\" New York Professional Responsibility Report, June 2000 at 1.\n106. \"Was Hubbell Case About Getting Justice or Getting Even?\" Los Angeles Times, June 18, 2000 at M2 (comment on the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in United States v. Hubbell, decided June 5, 2000).\n107. \"Who Owns the Privilege After a Merger?\" New York Professional Responsibility Report, July 2000 at 1.\n108. \"Fighting the Future,\" The American Lawyer, July 2000 at 55.\n109. \"Campus Visits Deconstructed,\" Newsweek: How To Get Into College, 2001 Edition at 46.\n110. \"The Court Should Boldly Take Charge,\" New York Times, Tuesday, November 21, 2000 at A25 (Florida's presidential election recount).\n111. \"Who Says the Election Has a Dec. 12 Deadline?\" New York Times, Saturday, December 2, 2000 at A19.\n112. \"Motive Is Everything in the Marc Rich Pardon,\" New York Times, Saturday, February 17, 2001.\n113. \"For Justice To Be Blind, Must Judges Be Mute?\" New York Times, Sunday, March 4, 2001 at Section 4, page 3.\n114. \"Should Supreme Court Justices Have Life Tenure?\" Reprinted in The Supreme Court and Its Justices (Choper J., ed.) (ABA 2001).\n115. Professionalism Symposium, 52 South Carolina L. Rev. 55 (2001) (closing remarks).\n116. \"No Lawyers To Call,\" New York Times, Monday, December 3, 2001 at A19 (ethical and constitutional obligations that will prevent lawyers from participating in military tribunals).\n117. \"Let Judicial Candidates Speak,\" New York Times, Thursday, March 28, 2002 at A31.\n118. \"The Flaw in the Andersen Verdict,\" New York Times, Tuesday, June 18, 2002 at A23.\n119. \"Why Judges Should Make Court Documents Public,\" New York Times, Saturday, November 30, 2002 at A17.\n120. \"It's an MJP World,\" ABA Journal, December 2002 at 51.\n121. \"Upholding the Law as Pretrial Publicity Goes Global,\" New York Times, Sunday, April 27, 2003, Sec. 4 at 14.",
      "position": "main body"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "17",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00009473",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Stephen Gillers",
      "Marc Rich",
      "Choper J.",
      "Hubbell"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "New York Times",
      "Los Angeles Times",
      "Newsweek",
      "ABA Journal",
      "American Lawyer",
      "ABA",
      "South Carolina L. Rev."
    ],
    "locations": [
      "Florida",
      "United States"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "04/06/12",
      "June 2000",
      "June 18, 2000",
      "June 5, 2000",
      "July 2000",
      "November 21, 2000",
      "December 2, 2000",
      "February 17, 2001",
      "March 4, 2001",
      "December 3, 2001",
      "March 28, 2002",
      "June 18, 2002",
      "November 30, 2002",
      "December 2002",
      "April 27, 2003"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:09-cr-00581-WHP",
      "Document 522",
      "DOJ-OGR-00009473"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing with a list of references to various news articles and legal publications. The text is clear and legible, with no visible redactions or damage."
}