| 12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364656667686970717273747576777879808182838485 |
- {
- "document_metadata": {
- "page_number": "1 of 2",
- "document_number": "628",
- "date": "03/02/22",
- "document_type": "Letter",
- "has_handwriting": false,
- "has_stamps": false
- },
- "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 628 Filed 03/02/22 Page 1 of 2 U.S Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York The Silvio J. Mollo Building One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York, New York 10007 March 2, 2022 BY ECF The Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Court Southern District of New York United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: The Government respectfully submits this letter in response to defense counsel's request to adjourn the hearing currently scheduled to occur on March 8, 2022 to a date in May 2022. (Dkt. No. 627). The Government strongly opposes defense counsel's request, as an adjournment—let alone a two-month adjournment—is not in the interests of justice. As an initial matter, this case is scheduled for sentencing in June and that date should not be delayed. The victims in this case deserve a timely resolution of this matter. Nearly one week after the Court issued its Opinion and Order scheduling the March 8, 2022 hearing (Dkt. No. 620), defense counsel filed its adjournment request, citing scheduling conflicts of the defendant's Colorado-based counsel. But the defendant is represented by multiple attorneys, at least two of whom are available.1 Moreover, because the Court has already ruled that the Court will conduct the questioning of Juror 50, and because the parties have had an opportunity to submit questions for the Court's consideration in advance of the hearing (id. at 16-17), the defendant does 1 Defense counsel's letter notes that Ms. Sternheim has a trial scheduled to start the following week, on March 16, 2022, but the Government notes that Ms. Sternheim is one of multiple defense attorneys in that case as well. DOJ-OGR-00009619",
- "text_blocks": [
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 628 Filed 03/02/22 Page 1 of 2",
- "position": "header"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "U.S Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York The Silvio J. Mollo Building One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York, New York 10007 March 2, 2022",
- "position": "header"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "BY ECF The Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Court Southern District of New York United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, New York 10007",
- "position": "top"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)",
- "position": "top"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Dear Judge Nathan: The Government respectfully submits this letter in response to defense counsel's request to adjourn the hearing currently scheduled to occur on March 8, 2022 to a date in May 2022. (Dkt. No. 627). The Government strongly opposes defense counsel's request, as an adjournment—let alone a two-month adjournment—is not in the interests of justice. As an initial matter, this case is scheduled for sentencing in June and that date should not be delayed. The victims in this case deserve a timely resolution of this matter.",
- "position": "middle"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Nearly one week after the Court issued its Opinion and Order scheduling the March 8, 2022 hearing (Dkt. No. 620), defense counsel filed its adjournment request, citing scheduling conflicts of the defendant's Colorado-based counsel. But the defendant is represented by multiple attorneys, at least two of whom are available.1 Moreover, because the Court has already ruled that the Court will conduct the questioning of Juror 50, and because the parties have had an opportunity to submit questions for the Court's consideration in advance of the hearing (id. at 16-17), the defendant does",
- "position": "middle"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "1 Defense counsel's letter notes that Ms. Sternheim has a trial scheduled to start the following week, on March 16, 2022, but the Government notes that Ms. Sternheim is one of multiple defense attorneys in that case as well.",
- "position": "footer"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "DOJ-OGR-00009619",
- "position": "footer"
- }
- ],
- "entities": {
- "people": [
- "Alison J. Nathan",
- "Ghislaine Maxwell",
- "Ms. Sternheim",
- "Juror 50"
- ],
- "organizations": [
- "U.S Department of Justice",
- "United States Attorney",
- "United States District Court",
- "Southern District of New York"
- ],
- "locations": [
- "New York",
- "Colorado"
- ],
- "dates": [
- "March 2, 2022",
- "March 8, 2022",
- "May 2022",
- "June",
- "March 16, 2022"
- ],
- "reference_numbers": [
- "20 Cr. 330 (AJN)",
- "Dkt. No. 627",
- "Dkt. No. 620",
- "DOJ-OGR-00009619"
- ]
- },
- "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a formal letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. It is typed and has a professional tone. There are no visible redactions or damage."
- }
|