| 123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960 |
- {
- "document_metadata": {
- "page_number": "13",
- "document_number": "636",
- "date": "03/01/22",
- "document_type": "court document",
- "has_handwriting": false,
- "has_stamps": false
- },
- "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 636 Filed 03/01/22 Page 13 of 22\nThe Honorable Alison J. Nathan\nMarch 1, 2022\nPage 13\nm. You responded \"Yes\" because you carefully read the question and realized that it was asking something different?\nn. The two questions before Question 41 asked if information you had heard about the case might make it difficult for you to be a fair and impartial juror?\no. You responded \"No\" to those questions?\np. By contrast, Question 41 asked whether you could put aside anything you heard and decide the case on the evidence?\nq. You responded \"Yes\" to that question?\nr. Because you had read the question carefully enough to know that your response to the question was different from the previous two?\n21. Please look at pages 24 of the questionnaire. That is where Question 48 appears?\na. You told the reporter from Reuters that you \"flew through\" the questionnaire and you don't recall being asked on the questionnaire about personal experiences with sexual abuse?\nb. You also told the reporter from the Daily Mail in your video interview that you weren't asked about your sexual abuse history in the jury questionnaire?\nc. When the reporter from the Daily Mail told you that Question 48 asked that very question, you said \"I don't remember it being there.\"\nd. But you also said, \"I definitely remember a family or relative or something ... being sexually abused.\"\n2100689.3\nDOJ-OGR-00009650",
- "text_blocks": [
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 636 Filed 03/01/22 Page 13 of 22",
- "position": "header"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "The Honorable Alison J. Nathan\nMarch 1, 2022\nPage 13",
- "position": "top"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "m. You responded \"Yes\" because you carefully read the question and realized that it was asking something different?\nn. The two questions before Question 41 asked if information you had heard about the case might make it difficult for you to be a fair and impartial juror?\no. You responded \"No\" to those questions?\np. By contrast, Question 41 asked whether you could put aside anything you heard and decide the case on the evidence?\nq. You responded \"Yes\" to that question?\nr. Because you had read the question carefully enough to know that your response to the question was different from the previous two?",
- "position": "middle"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "21. Please look at pages 24 of the questionnaire. That is where Question 48 appears?\na. You told the reporter from Reuters that you \"flew through\" the questionnaire and you don't recall being asked on the questionnaire about personal experiences with sexual abuse?\nb. You also told the reporter from the Daily Mail in your video interview that you weren't asked about your sexual abuse history in the jury questionnaire?\nc. When the reporter from the Daily Mail told you that Question 48 asked that very question, you said \"I don't remember it being there.\"\nd. But you also said, \"I definitely remember a family or relative or something ... being sexually abused.\"",
- "position": "middle"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "2100689.3\nDOJ-OGR-00009650",
- "position": "footer"
- }
- ],
- "entities": {
- "people": [
- "Alison J. Nathan"
- ],
- "organizations": [
- "Reuters",
- "Daily Mail",
- "DOJ"
- ],
- "locations": [],
- "dates": [
- "March 1, 2022",
- "03/01/22"
- ],
- "reference_numbers": [
- "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
- "636",
- "2100689.3",
- "DOJ-OGR-00009650"
- ]
- },
- "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript or legal document related to a case. It is well-formatted and printed, with no visible handwriting or stamps."
- }
|