| 1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253545556575859606162636465666768697071 |
- {
- "document_metadata": {
- "page_number": "7",
- "document_number": "643",
- "date": "03/11/22",
- "document_type": "court document",
- "has_handwriting": false,
- "has_stamps": false
- },
- "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 643 Filed 03/11/22 Page 7 of 49 Juror 63 also answered Question 48 in the affirmative and said her experience would not affect her ability to be fair and impartial. She indicated several times during voir dire that she could be fair and impartial in the case. See, e.g., id. at 216:19-217:2. Neither the Government nor defense counsel challenged Juror 63 for cause. Juror 93 wrote that During voir dire, in response to questioning, Juror 93 said that she was sexually molested by an uncle when she was 12 or 13, as was her sister and an aunt, but that would not affect her ability to be fair and impartial in the case and that the allegations in the case would not upset her in a way that would distract from her duty as a juror. Id. at 259:4-13. Neither the Government nor defense counsel challenged Juror 93 for cause. Juror 113 indicated that he had experienced sexual harassment, along with \"pretty much every woman I know,\" but that would not affect his ability to be fair and impartial. During voir dire, Juror 113 stated that he did not believe his experience would make it difficult for him to serve as a juror and that he could be fair and impartial. Id. at 293:10-20. Neither the Government nor defense counsel challenged Juror 113 for cause. Juror 189 wrote about She indicated that it would not affect her ability to be fair and impartial. During voir dire, Juror 189 reiterated that her experiences would not interfere in any way with her ability to be fair and impartial. Nov. 17, 2021 Tr. at 532:13-18. Juror 239 wrote in response to Question 48 of the juror questionnaire During voir dire, Juror 239 reiterated that her experience would not interfere in any way with her ability to be fair to both sides. Nov. 18, 2021 Tr. at 635:2-8. Neither the Government nor defense counsel challenged Juror 239 for cause. In sum, there were eight jurors who were ultimately qualified who had answered Question 48 affirmatively. Each confirmed that he or she could be fair and impartial. Defense counsel 5 DOJ-OGR-00009805",
- "text_blocks": [
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 643 Filed 03/11/22 Page 7 of 49",
- "position": "header"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Juror 63 also answered Question 48 in the affirmative and said her experience would not affect her ability to be fair and impartial. She indicated several times during voir dire that she could be fair and impartial in the case. See, e.g., id. at 216:19-217:2. Neither the Government nor defense counsel challenged Juror 63 for cause.",
- "position": "body"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Juror 93 wrote that During voir dire, in response to questioning, Juror 93 said that she was sexually molested by an uncle when she was 12 or 13, as was her sister and an aunt, but that would not affect her ability to be fair and impartial in the case and that the allegations in the case would not upset her in a way that would distract from her duty as a juror. Id. at 259:4-13. Neither the Government nor defense counsel challenged Juror 93 for cause.",
- "position": "body"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Juror 113 indicated that he had experienced sexual harassment, along with \"pretty much every woman I know,\" but that would not affect his ability to be fair and impartial. During voir dire, Juror 113 stated that he did not believe his experience would make it difficult for him to serve as a juror and that he could be fair and impartial. Id. at 293:10-20. Neither the Government nor defense counsel challenged Juror 113 for cause.",
- "position": "body"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Juror 189 wrote about She indicated that it would not affect her ability to be fair and impartial. During voir dire, Juror 189 reiterated that her experiences would not interfere in any way with her ability to be fair and impartial. Nov. 17, 2021 Tr. at 532:13-18.",
- "position": "body"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Juror 239 wrote in response to Question 48 of the juror questionnaire During voir dire, Juror 239 reiterated that her experience would not interfere in any way with her ability to be fair to both sides. Nov. 18, 2021 Tr. at 635:2-8. Neither the Government nor defense counsel challenged Juror 239 for cause.",
- "position": "body"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "In sum, there were eight jurors who were ultimately qualified who had answered Question 48 affirmatively. Each confirmed that he or she could be fair and impartial. Defense counsel 5",
- "position": "body"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "DOJ-OGR-00009805",
- "position": "footer"
- }
- ],
- "entities": {
- "people": [],
- "organizations": [
- "Government"
- ],
- "locations": [],
- "dates": [
- "03/11/22",
- "Nov. 17, 2021",
- "Nov. 18, 2021"
- ],
- "reference_numbers": [
- "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
- "643",
- "DOJ-OGR-00009805"
- ]
- },
- "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript or legal document discussing juror selection and voir dire. There are several redactions throughout the document."
- }
|