mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00010011.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "271",
    "document_number": "A-5728",
    "date": null,
    "document_type": "Court Transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "C2GFDAU1 Brune - direct 271\n1 A. I do remember that.\n2 Q. And at that point you could have asked Judge Pauley to\n3 inquire specifically of Juror No. 1, if I could call her Juror\n4 No. 1, I know the juror numbers changed, but Catherine Conrad?\n5 A. I know who you mean.\n6 Q. About the potentiality that she was a suspended attorney,\n7 correct?\n8 A. Certainly could have asked him to do that.\n9 Q. You had this potentially highly pertinent piece of\n10 information in your hands at that point and you did nothing\n11 with it with regard to what the Court was asking of the jurors.\n12 A. As I think you know, we concluded it was a different person\n13 and therefore did not view it as the highly significant\n14 information that, unfortunately, it turned out to be.\n15 Q. Well, you had a way, you had information in your hand that\n16 could have further illuminated this issue, correct?\n17 A. When you say \"in your hand\" I think what you mean is that\n18 we knew it. We did not have in our hands a printout. But\n19 certainly we had the discussion that I've described and Ms.\n20 Trzaskoma had done the Google search that we've talked about.\n21 Q. And that Google search resulted in her finding a document,\n22 correct?\n23 A. That's my understanding, yes.\n24 Q. And even if she didn't have a printout of it in court, she\n25 had it on the computer that she had sitting in front of her,\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "C2GFDAU1 Brune - direct 271",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 A. I do remember that.\n2 Q. And at that point you could have asked Judge Pauley to\n3 inquire specifically of Juror No. 1, if I could call her Juror\n4 No. 1, I know the juror numbers changed, but Catherine Conrad?\n5 A. I know who you mean.\n6 Q. About the potentiality that she was a suspended attorney,\n7 correct?\n8 A. Certainly could have asked him to do that.\n9 Q. You had this potentially highly pertinent piece of\n10 information in your hands at that point and you did nothing\n11 with it with regard to what the Court was asking of the jurors.\n12 A. As I think you know, we concluded it was a different person\n13 and therefore did not view it as the highly significant\n14 information that, unfortunately, it turned out to be.\n15 Q. Well, you had a way, you had information in your hand that\n16 could have further illuminated this issue, correct?\n17 A. When you say \"in your hand\" I think what you mean is that\n18 we knew it. We did not have in our hands a printout. But\n19 certainly we had the discussion that I've described and Ms.\n20 Trzaskoma had done the Google search that we've talked about.\n21 Q. And that Google search resulted in her finding a document,\n22 correct?\n23 A. That's my understanding, yes.\n24 Q. And even if she didn't have a printout of it in court, she\n25 had it on the computer that she had sitting in front of her,",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Judge Pauley",
      "Catherine Conrad",
      "Ms. Trzaskoma"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "A-5728",
      "C2GFDAU1"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}