mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00010049.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "309",
    "document_number": "A-5766",
    "date": null,
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "C2grdau2 Brune - direct 309\n1 MR. SHECHTMAN: I do, your Honor. Would it be an\n2 appropriate time to take a short break?\n3 THE COURT: Yes, it would be.\n4 MS. DAVIS: I apologize, your Honor. I lost track of\n5 the time.\n6 THE COURT: It's all right. We'll take a ten-minute\n7 recess and resume.\n8 (Recess)\n9 THE COURT: Mr. Shechtman, you may inquire.\n10 MR. SHECHTMAN: Thank you, Judge.\n11 CROSS-EXAMINATION\n12 BY MR. SHECHTMAN:\n13 Q. Ms. Brune, when your firm exercised its challenges for\n14 cause and its peremptory challenges, did you believe Catherine\n15 Conrad, Juror No. 1, was a suspended lawyer?\n16 A. No.\n17 Q. Why not?\n18 A. During the voir dire we believed that her sworn responses\n19 to Judge Pauley's questions ruled that out.\n20 Q. If you had believed that she was a suspended lawyer, indeed\n21 a suspended lawyer with an alcohol dependency, would you have\n22 wanted her on the jury?\n23 A. No.\n24 Q. Why not?\n25 A. First of all, the case involved lawyers, and I think that\n    SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n    (212) 805-0300\n\nDOJ-OGR-00010049",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "C2grdau2 Brune - direct 309",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "MR. SHECHTMAN: I do, your Honor. Would it be an appropriate time to take a short break? THE COURT: Yes, it would be. MS. DAVIS: I apologize, your Honor. I lost track of the time. THE COURT: It's all right. We'll take a ten-minute recess and resume. (Recess) THE COURT: Mr. Shechtman, you may inquire. MR. SHECHTMAN: Thank you, Judge. CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR. SHECHTMAN: Q. Ms. Brune, when your firm exercised its challenges for cause and its peremptory challenges, did you believe Catherine Conrad, Juror No. 1, was a suspended lawyer? A. No. Q. Why not? A. During the voir dire we believed that her sworn responses to Judge Pauley's questions ruled that out. Q. If you had believed that she was a suspended lawyer, indeed a suspended lawyer with an alcohol dependency, would you have wanted her on the jury? A. No. Q. Why not? A. First of all, the case involved lawyers, and I think that",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00010049",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MR. SHECHTMAN",
      "MS. DAVIS",
      "MS. BRUNE",
      "CATHERINE CONRAD",
      "JUDGE PAULEY"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.",
      "THE COURT"
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "A-5766",
      "DOJ-OGR-00010049",
      "(212) 805-0300"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear structure and formatting. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}