mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00010056.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "316",
    "document_number": "A-5773",
    "date": null,
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "C2GFDAU3 Brune - redirect 316\n1 Q. And none of these pieces of information would have been\n2 important to you, is that what you're saying?\n3 A. What I'm saying is, is this thing to me looks, and I think\n4 would have looked had I seen it at the time, as kind of like a\n5 credit report, and I think it would have confirmed what I\n6 thought I already knew, which is that there were two people who\n7 had the same name. Now that we know the truth, it seems like\n8 this is information that could point the other way, but I think\n9 if I had it I wouldn't have seen it as changing the picture\n10 that we had.\n11 Q. And you wouldn't have chosen to investigate?\n12 A. I would not.\n13 Q. Despite your training as an AUSA conducting many Grand Jury\n14 investigations?\n15 A. That's right.\n16 MS. DAVIS: No further questions.\n17 MR. SCHECTMAN: Just one, Judge.\n18 RECROSS EXAMINATION\n19 BY MR. SCHECTMAN:\n20 Q. Ms. Brune, the Social Security numbers are redacted from\n21 that document, am I correct?\n22 A. That's correct.\n23 Q. Have you had a chance to look at the unredacted version?\n24 A. Yes.\n25 Q. And what have you learned about the Social Security\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00010056",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "C2GFDAU3 Brune - redirect 316",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 Q. And none of these pieces of information would have been\n2 important to you, is that what you're saying?\n3 A. What I'm saying is, is this thing to me looks, and I think\n4 would have looked had I seen it at the time, as kind of like a\n5 credit report, and I think it would have confirmed what I\n6 thought I already knew, which is that there were two people who\n7 had the same name. Now that we know the truth, it seems like\n8 this is information that could point the other way, but I think\n9 if I had it I wouldn't have seen it as changing the picture\n10 that we had.\n11 Q. And you wouldn't have chosen to investigate?\n12 A. I would not.\n13 Q. Despite your training as an AUSA conducting many Grand Jury\n14 investigations?\n15 A. That's right.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "16 MS. DAVIS: No further questions.\n17 MR. SCHECTMAN: Just one, Judge.\n18 RECROSS EXAMINATION\n19 BY MR. SCHECTMAN:",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "20 Q. Ms. Brune, the Social Security numbers are redacted from\n21 that document, am I correct?\n22 A. That's correct.\n23 Q. Have you had a chance to look at the unredacted version?\n24 A. Yes.\n25 Q. And what have you learned about the Social Security",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00010056",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Brune",
      "Davis",
      "Schectman"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.",
      "DOJ"
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "C2GFDAU3",
      "A-5773",
      "DOJ-OGR-00010056"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a redirect examination of a witness named Brune. The transcript includes questions and answers related to a case, as well as a recross examination. The document has a header with the case number and page number, and a footer with a phone number and a reference number."
}