| 12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152 |
- {
- "document_metadata": {
- "page_number": "332",
- "document_number": "A-5789",
- "date": null,
- "document_type": "transcript",
- "has_handwriting": false,
- "has_stamps": false
- },
- "full_text": "C2GFDAU3 Edelstein 332\n1 A. Subsequent to the July 15th conference.\n2 Q. Can you put a date on that?\n3 A. Actually, I'm not sure when I first saw it. I was informed\n4 about it I think July 20th or so. I'm not sure.\n5 Q. So Theresa Trzaskoma never told you about the Jesus e-mail\n6 prior to her participation in the July 15th conference, is that\n7 fair?\n8 A. Yes.\n9 Q. Did Theresa Trzaskoma tell you that a dossier had been\n10 created at her request with respect to Catherine Conrad when\n11 she was gathering information on May 12?\n12 A. After we received the letter from Juror No. 1 on June 20th,\n13 I had a conversation with Theresa Trzaskoma where she mentioned\n14 that there was some information that had been gathered.\n15 Q. And you said in response to that what?\n16 A. I asked where it was and she was actually overseas at the\n17 time and didn't have access to the computer, so she didn't,\n18 wasn't sure exactly what, the file that was there, what had\n19 been gathered, but she let me know where I could try to find\n20 it.\n21 Q. Just so we're clear, what date is this?\n22 A. I believe the night of June 20th.\n23 Q. And is it fair to say that you received the dossier?\n24 A. I wouldn't characterize it as a dossier, but the next day I\n25 was directed to the memo that David Benhamou our paralegal had\n(212) 805-0300\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.",
- "text_blocks": [
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "C2GFDAU3 Edelstein 332",
- "position": "header"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "1 A. Subsequent to the July 15th conference.\n2 Q. Can you put a date on that?\n3 A. Actually, I'm not sure when I first saw it. I was informed\n4 about it I think July 20th or so. I'm not sure.\n5 Q. So Theresa Trzaskoma never told you about the Jesus e-mail\n6 prior to her participation in the July 15th conference, is that\n7 fair?\n8 A. Yes.\n9 Q. Did Theresa Trzaskoma tell you that a dossier had been\n10 created at her request with respect to Catherine Conrad when\n11 she was gathering information on May 12?\n12 A. After we received the letter from Juror No. 1 on June 20th,\n13 I had a conversation with Theresa Trzaskoma where she mentioned\n14 that there was some information that had been gathered.\n15 Q. And you said in response to that what?\n16 A. I asked where it was and she was actually overseas at the\n17 time and didn't have access to the computer, so she didn't,\n18 wasn't sure exactly what, the file that was there, what had\n19 been gathered, but she let me know where I could try to find\n20 it.\n21 Q. Just so we're clear, what date is this?\n22 A. I believe the night of June 20th.\n23 Q. And is it fair to say that you received the dossier?\n24 A. I wouldn't characterize it as a dossier, but the next day I\n25 was directed to the memo that David Benhamou our paralegal had",
- "position": "main"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "(212) 805-0300\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.",
- "position": "footer"
- }
- ],
- "entities": {
- "people": [
- "Edelstein",
- "Theresa Trzaskoma",
- "Catherine Conrad",
- "David Benhamou"
- ],
- "organizations": [
- "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
- ],
- "locations": [],
- "dates": [
- "July 15th",
- "July 20th",
- "May 12",
- "June 20th"
- ],
- "reference_numbers": [
- "C2GFDAU3",
- "A-5789",
- "Juror No. 1"
- ]
- },
- "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a transcript of a deposition or testimony. The text is clear and legible, with no visible redactions or damage."
- }
|