DOJ-OGR-00010166.json 3.8 KB

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "9",
  4. "document_number": "A-5911",
  5. "date": null,
  6. "document_type": "court transcript",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "CAC3PARC\n1 themselves we failed the Court. I have said to myself a\n2 hundred times, it is so easy the next morning or even that\n3 afternoon to walk back in and say to the judge, Judge, we\n4 think -- we don't really believe this, for a variety of\n5 reasons, but you should know the following. That she has the\n6 same name, there is other information here, and whatever your\n7 Honor wants to do with it, we don't think it's her, but we\n8 would be foolish if we didn't bring this to your attention.\n9 I think what happened to the Brune firm was after this\n10 revelation, they said to themselves oh God, we really did drop\n11 the ball. But dropping the ball is ineffectiveness. Dropping\n12 the ball to me is not strategy.\n13 Look, if your Honor looks at that conduct, and I know,\n14 and I say this respectfully, I know how much that conduct eats\n15 at the Court because it's wrong, and the result of it is a very\n16 long trial in this courtroom has to be done again. But, I also\n17 don't think that one looks at it and says ah-ha, there was a\n18 strategy going on.\n19 I think the lawyers thought to themselves that the\n20 Court is going to be very disappointed in us if it realizes\n21 that we didn't come forward. Right. If it realizes we took\n22 for an answer it can't be her, when investigation or telling\n23 the Court was the better course.\n24 If the Court concludes that that conduct is so\n25 egregious that circumstantially it proves strategy, I'm not\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "CAC3PARC",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "themselves we failed the Court. I have said to myself a hundred times, it is so easy the next morning or even that afternoon to walk back in and say to the judge, Judge, we think -- we don't really believe this, for a variety of reasons, but you should know the following. That she has the same name, there is other information here, and whatever your Honor wants to do with it, we don't think it's her, but we would be foolish if we didn't bring this to your attention. I think what happened to the Brune firm was after this revelation, they said to themselves oh God, we really did drop the ball. But dropping the ball is ineffectiveness. Dropping the ball to me is not strategy. Look, if your Honor looks at that conduct, and I know, and I say this respectfully, I know how much that conduct eats at the Court because it's wrong, and the result of it is a very long trial in this courtroom has to be done again. But, I also don't think that one looks at it and says ah-ha, there was a strategy going on. I think the lawyers thought to themselves that the Court is going to be very disappointed in us if it realizes that we didn't come forward. Right. If it realizes we took for an answer it can't be her, when investigation or telling the Court was the better course. If the Court concludes that that conduct is so egregious that circumstantially it proves strategy, I'm not",
  20. "position": "main"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
  25. "position": "footer"
  26. }
  27. ],
  28. "entities": {
  29. "people": [],
  30. "organizations": [
  31. "Brune firm",
  32. "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
  33. ],
  34. "locations": [],
  35. "dates": [],
  36. "reference_numbers": [
  37. "A-5911",
  38. "DOJ-OGR-00010166"
  39. ]
  40. },
  41. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and readable format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
  42. }