DOJ-OGR-00010241.json 3.6 KB

12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "26 of 50",
  4. "document_number": "645",
  5. "date": "03/11/22",
  6. "document_type": "court transcript",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 645 Filed 03/11/22 Page 26 of 50 M38TMAX1\n\naffected your ability to render a verdict based solely on the evidence presented at trial and my instructions as to the law?\nA. Yeah. No, your Honor, I would be able to review the evidence based solely on the evidence.\nQ. Okay. At the time I asked you questions, and if you answered accurately, did you believe there's anything about your experience with prior sexual abuse that would interfere with your ability to assess the credibility of witnesses alleging sexual abuse?\nA. Absolutely in no way.\nQ. So at the time did you believe that you would be able to conclude that a witness alleging sexual abuse was not testifying truthfully if that was what the evidence suggested?\nA. Correct, your Honor, yes, I did.\nQ. At the time I asked you questions on November 16, did you harbor any bias against Ms. Maxwell?\nA. Not at all.\nQ. At the time I asked you questions on November 16, were with you biased in favor of the government or the prosecution?\nA. Not at all, your Honor.\nQ. Did you want to put your thumb on the scale in any direction?\nA. No.\nQ. At the time I asked you questions, and in light of your experience with sexual abuse, did you believe that the subject\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00010241",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 645 Filed 03/11/22 Page 26 of 50 M38TMAX1",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "affected your ability to render a verdict based solely on the evidence presented at trial and my instructions as to the law?\nA. Yeah. No, your Honor, I would be able to review the evidence based solely on the evidence.\nQ. Okay. At the time I asked you questions, and if you answered accurately, did you believe there's anything about your experience with prior sexual abuse that would interfere with your ability to assess the credibility of witnesses alleging sexual abuse?\nA. Absolutely in no way.\nQ. So at the time did you believe that you would be able to conclude that a witness alleging sexual abuse was not testifying truthfully if that was what the evidence suggested?\nA. Correct, your Honor, yes, I did.\nQ. At the time I asked you questions on November 16, did you harbor any bias against Ms. Maxwell?\nA. Not at all.\nQ. At the time I asked you questions on November 16, were with you biased in favor of the government or the prosecution?\nA. Not at all, your Honor.\nQ. Did you want to put your thumb on the scale in any direction?\nA. No.\nQ. At the time I asked you questions, and in light of your experience with sexual abuse, did you believe that the subject",
  20. "position": "main"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
  25. "position": "footer"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00010241",
  30. "position": "footer"
  31. }
  32. ],
  33. "entities": {
  34. "people": [
  35. "Ms. Maxwell"
  36. ],
  37. "organizations": [
  38. "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
  39. ],
  40. "locations": [],
  41. "dates": [
  42. "November 16",
  43. "03/11/22"
  44. ],
  45. "reference_numbers": [
  46. "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
  47. "645",
  48. "DOJ-OGR-00010241"
  49. ]
  50. },
  51. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
  52. }