mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00010245.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "30 of 50",
    "document_number": "645",
    "date": "03/11/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 645 Filed 03/11/22 Page 30 of 50 30 M38TMAX1 our follow up: How long did this go on? When did it stop? Were you home when this happened? What was the interaction between you and the abusers and family members? These are all things that go to the similarity. THE COURT: I have the same response. I considered those questions. We had, I think it was Juror 21 who had talked about familial abuse. The defense didn't propose any comparable follow-up questions. The questions went to the core questions of impartiality and fairness. The defense didn't request those questions and they didn't move to strike for cause. Here, there's dissimilarity of age; for example, younger than some of the proposed jurors, some of the inquired-into jurors who indicated yes, the defense didn't request follow up as to the specific similarities and the like, and I don't think I would have asked them because the bottom line questions are what is in issue. So that request is denied. Any other proposed follow up? MR. EVERDELL: Yes, I have a few more. MS. STERNHEIM: Judge, you have asked certain things about the questionnaire, but I do not believe that you asked about the summary of the case which specifically says what this case is about, it is about sexual abuse of a minor, and did he just fly through that as well? It is clear that this juror has supplemented -- SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00010245",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 645 Filed 03/11/22 Page 30 of 50 30",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "M38TMAX1 our follow up: How long did this go on? When did it stop? Were you home when this happened? What was the interaction between you and the abusers and family members? These are all things that go to the similarity.",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "THE COURT: I have the same response. I considered those questions. We had, I think it was Juror 21 who had talked about familial abuse. The defense didn't propose any comparable follow-up questions. The questions went to the core questions of impartiality and fairness. The defense didn't request those questions and they didn't move to strike for cause. Here, there's dissimilarity of age; for example, younger than some of the proposed jurors, some of the inquired-into jurors who indicated yes, the defense didn't request follow up as to the specific similarities and the like, and I don't think I would have asked them because the bottom line questions are what is in issue. So that request is denied.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Any other proposed follow up? MR. EVERDELL: Yes, I have a few more. MS. STERNHEIM: Judge, you have asked certain things about the questionnaire, but I do not believe that you asked about the summary of the case which specifically says what this case is about, it is about sexual abuse of a minor, and did he just fly through that as well? It is clear that this juror has supplemented --",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00010245",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MR. EVERDELL",
      "MS. STERNHEIM",
      "Juror 21"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "03/11/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "645",
      "DOJ-OGR-00010245"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}