mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00010249.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "34",
    "document_number": "645",
    "date": "03/11/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 645 Filed 03/11/22 Page 34 of 50 34 M38TMAX1\n\n1 MS. MODE: Thank you, your Honor.\n2 THE COURT: And then I will --\n3 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, I believe he mentioned something about his interview with the journalist Lucia, first name Lucia, and I was trying to follow his response, but he said something about: I didn't understand that this was an issue in the questionnaire. But I believe the reporting is that they discussed this at length, the consequences of him going public and the consequences of the fact that there was a jury questionnaire at issue here and there were answers to those questions that he would be talking about. I can't remember exactly what it is, but there was some discussion about the consequences of him going forward. And I believe what he said was: I didn't have any discussions or any lengthy discussions with the journalists about me coming forward and just answered their questions. But I believe there was a discussion with Lucia about the consequences, about whether he wants to do this, about -- I don't remember now --\n19 THE COURT: I don't understand what you're referring to.\n20 to.\n21 MR. EVERDELL: I think the issue is he was saying how he didn't expect to be public, he didn't expect to be known worldwide as a victim of sexual abuse, he didn't expect this come out, even though he's talking to journalists. My understanding is he had a discussion with Lucia, the journalist\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\n\nDOJ-OGR-00010249",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 645 Filed 03/11/22 Page 34 of 50 34 M38TMAX1",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 MS. MODE: Thank you, your Honor.\n2 THE COURT: And then I will --\n3 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, I believe he mentioned something about his interview with the journalist Lucia, first name Lucia, and I was trying to follow his response, but he said something about: I didn't understand that this was an issue in the questionnaire. But I believe the reporting is that they discussed this at length, the consequences of him going public and the consequences of the fact that there was a jury questionnaire at issue here and there were answers to those questions that he would be talking about. I can't remember exactly what it is, but there was some discussion about the consequences of him going forward. And I believe what he said was: I didn't have any discussions or any lengthy discussions with the journalists about me coming forward and just answered their questions. But I believe there was a discussion with Lucia about the consequences, about whether he wants to do this, about -- I don't remember now --\n19 THE COURT: I don't understand what you're referring to.\n20 to.\n21 MR. EVERDELL: I think the issue is he was saying how he didn't expect to be public, he didn't expect to be known worldwide as a victim of sexual abuse, he didn't expect this come out, even though he's talking to journalists. My understanding is he had a discussion with Lucia, the journalist",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00010249",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MS. MODE",
      "MR. EVERDELL",
      "Lucia"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "03/11/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "645",
      "DOJ-OGR-00010249"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}