mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00010251.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "36 of 50",
    "document_number": "645",
    "date": "03/11/22",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 645 Filed 03/11/22 Page 36 of 50 36 M38TMAX1 that talking to a reporter would necessarily make you known to the world about -- your sexual abuse known to the world. If that wasn't something that truly entered your head, isn't it a fact that you spoke to Lucia, the reporter from The Independent that you spoke to, about the consequences that you might face in revealing all this stuff -- we won't get into jury deliberations -- about what you said to her about your sexual abuse and other things, there would be well-known consequences to what you were doing. How do you square those two thoughts in your head, which you didn't think it would be public, didn't think you would be known for this, and the journalist is telling you that very fact? MS. MOE: Your Honor, the government has no objection to limited follow-up questions about his understanding about whether it would become public. I do have concerns about the proposed question because it's confusing and a little cryptic. I don't know what the word \"consequences\" might mean in response to the question or what that's in particular driving at. I think, as the Court noted, he has already sort of explained his understanding about speaking publicly to a reporter and whether it would be publicly known that he was the victim of sexual abuse. There's also, I think, some tension between the Court's focused question about whether he understood it would become public that he was the victim of sexual abuse and SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00010251",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 645 Filed 03/11/22 Page 36 of 50 36",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "M38TMAX1 that talking to a reporter would necessarily make you known to the world about -- your sexual abuse known to the world. If that wasn't something that truly entered your head, isn't it a fact that you spoke to Lucia, the reporter from The Independent that you spoke to, about the consequences that you might face in revealing all this stuff -- we won't get into jury deliberations -- about what you said to her about your sexual abuse and other things, there would be well-known consequences to what you were doing. How do you square those two thoughts in your head, which you didn't think it would be public, didn't think you would be known for this, and the journalist is telling you that very fact?",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "MS. MOE: Your Honor, the government has no objection to limited follow-up questions about his understanding about whether it would become public. I do have concerns about the proposed question because it's confusing and a little cryptic. I don't know what the word \"consequences\" might mean in response to the question or what that's in particular driving at. I think, as the Court noted, he has already sort of explained his understanding about speaking publicly to a reporter and whether it would be publicly known that he was the victim of sexual abuse.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "There's also, I think, some tension between the Court's focused question about whether he understood it would become public that he was the victim of sexual abuse and",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00010251",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Lucia"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "The Independent",
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "03/11/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "645",
      "DOJ-OGR-00010251"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and readable format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}