mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00010261.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "46",
    "document_number": "645",
    "date": "03/11/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 645 Filed 03/11/22 Page 46 of 50 M38YMAX2\n1 THE COURT: I don't understand what the question is.\n2 MS. STERNHEIM: Well, you had read that. So you knew\n3 what this case about, and that was in your mind when you were\n4 answering the questionnaire. For him to say that --\n5 THE COURT: I don't want argument.\n6 What question do you want me to ask?\n7 MS. STERNHEIM: Did you read the summary of the case\n8 and understand that the subject matter of this case --\n9 THE COURT: Well, I won't summarize it. I'll read the\n10 whole thing and ask: \"Did you understand that that was the\n11 subject matter of the case?\"\n12 MS. STERNHEIM: Yes.\n13 MS. POMERANTZ: No objection, your Honor. Thank you.\n14 (In open court)\n15 BY THE COURT:\n16 Q. Returning to the questionnaire, it says, page 4. It's\n17 actually the second page of the questionnaire. There were\n18 documents that you took off when you filled it out.\n19 I provided a summary of the case.\n20 Do you recall that?\n21 A. Yes, your Honor.\n22 Q. The third paragraph down in that summary reads: \"The\n23 charges of the indictment stem from allegations that from at\n24 least 1994 through 2004, the defendant conspired with and aided\n25 and abetted Jeffrey Epstein to entice minors to travel to\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00010261",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 645 Filed 03/11/22 Page 46 of 50 M38YMAX2",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 THE COURT: I don't understand what the question is.\n2 MS. STERNHEIM: Well, you had read that. So you knew\n3 what this case about, and that was in your mind when you were\n4 answering the questionnaire. For him to say that --\n5 THE COURT: I don't want argument.\n6 What question do you want me to ask?\n7 MS. STERNHEIM: Did you read the summary of the case\n8 and understand that the subject matter of this case --\n9 THE COURT: Well, I won't summarize it. I'll read the\n10 whole thing and ask: \"Did you understand that that was the\n11 subject matter of the case?\"\n12 MS. STERNHEIM: Yes.\n13 MS. POMERANTZ: No objection, your Honor. Thank you.\n14 (In open court)\n15 BY THE COURT:\n16 Q. Returning to the questionnaire, it says, page 4. It's\n17 actually the second page of the questionnaire. There were\n18 documents that you took off when you filled it out.\n19 I provided a summary of the case.\n20 Do you recall that?\n21 A. Yes, your Honor.\n22 Q. The third paragraph down in that summary reads: \"The\n23 charges of the indictment stem from allegations that from at\n24 least 1994 through 2004, the defendant conspired with and aided\n25 and abetted Jeffrey Epstein to entice minors to travel to",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00010261",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Jeffrey Epstein"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "03/11/22",
      "1994",
      "2004"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "645",
      "DOJ-OGR-00010261"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}